|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] x86/PoD: correct ordering of checks in p2m_pod_zero_check()
On 07.04.2020 14:39, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: 07 April 2020 12:08
>> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Roger Pau Monné
>> <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu
>> <wl@xxxxxxx>; Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [PATCH] x86/PoD: correct ordering of checks in p2m_pod_zero_check()
>>
>> Commit 0537d246f8db ("mm: add 'is_special_page' inline function...")
>> moved the is_special_page() checks first in its respective changes to
>> PoD code. While this is fine for p2m_pod_zero_check_superpage(), the
>> validity of the MFN is inferred in both cases from the p2m_is_ram()
>> check, which therefore also needs to come first in this 2nd instance.
>>
>> Take the opportunity and address latent UB here as well - transform
>> the MFN into struct page_info * only after having established that
>> this is a valid page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>
Thanks.
> ...with a suggestion below
>
>> ---
>> I will admit that this was build tested only. I did observe the crash
>> late yesterday while in the office, but got around to analyzing it only
>> today, where I'm again restricted in what I can reasonably test.
>>
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m-pod.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m-pod.c
>> @@ -877,23 +877,25 @@ p2m_pod_zero_check(struct p2m_domain *p2
>> for ( i = 0; i < count; i++ )
>> {
>> p2m_access_t a;
>> - struct page_info *pg;
>>
>> mfns[i] = p2m->get_entry(p2m, gfns[i], types + i, &a,
>> 0, NULL, NULL);
>> - pg = mfn_to_page(mfns[i]);
>>
>> /*
>> * If this is ram, and not a pagetable or a special page, and
>> * probably not mapped elsewhere, map it; otherwise, skip.
>> */
>> - if ( !is_special_page(pg) && p2m_is_ram(types[i]) &&
>> - (pg->count_info & PGC_allocated) &&
>> - !(pg->count_info & PGC_page_table) &&
>> - ((pg->count_info & PGC_count_mask) <= max_ref) )
>> - map[i] = map_domain_page(mfns[i]);
>> - else
>> - map[i] = NULL;
>> + map[i] = NULL;
>> + if ( p2m_is_ram(types[i]) )
>> + {
>> + const struct page_info *pg = mfn_to_page(mfns[i]);
>
> Perhaps have local scope stack variable for count_info too?
I'd view this as useful only if ...
>> +
>> + if ( !is_special_page(pg) &&
... this could then also be made make use of it.
Jan
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |