[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86/ucode/amd: Don't use void * for microcode_patch->mpb

To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 16:28:02 +0200
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 14:28:08 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 31.03.2020 12:05, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> All code works fine with it having its correct type, and it even allows us to
> drop two casts in a printk().
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH 00/11] x86/ucode: Cleanup and fixes - Part 4/n (AMD)
  - From: Andrew Cooper
- [PATCH 03/11] x86/ucode/amd: Don't use void * for microcode_patch->mpb
  - From: Andrew Cooper

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86/ucode/amd: Move check_final_patch_levels() to apply_microcode()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 04/11] x86/ucode/amd: Collect CPUID.1.EAX in collect_cpu_info()
Previous by thread: [PATCH 03/11] x86/ucode/amd: Don't use void * for microcode_patch->mpb
Next by thread: [PATCH 05/11] x86/ucode/amd: Overhaul the equivalent cpu table handling completely
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.