|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 7/7] x86/ucode/intel: Fold structures together
On 25.03.2020 15:32, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 25/03/2020 14:16, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 23.03.2020 11:17, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> Currently, we allocate an 8 byte struct microcode_patch to point at a
>>> separately allocated struct microcode_intel. This is wasteful.
>> As indicated elsewhere I'm very much in favor of this, but I think it
>> wants doing in one of the earlier series, and then for AMD at the same
>> time.
>
> I've got some ideas for an AMD series given the replies I got, and will
> be able to do an equivalent microcode_amd => microcode_patch folding on
> that side. There is also further work to do, including unbreaking the
> OSVW logic (which has been totally clobbered by the start/end_update
> debacle).
>
> However, given that it taken this whole series to make the transition
> look safe on the Intel side, I really don't see a way of doing this
> "earlier".
>
> In particular, no amount of ifdefary suggested below can AFAICT make it
> safe to do this transform without having microcode_patch opaque to being
> with.
>
> Yes - there is a bit of churn, but I can't see a safe alternative.
Something like the one below (compile tested only, and not really
cleaned up in any way)?
Jan
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/amd.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/amd.c
@@ -60,13 +60,15 @@ struct __packed microcode_header_amd {
#define UCODE_EQUIV_CPU_TABLE_TYPE 0x00000000
#define UCODE_UCODE_TYPE 0x00000001
-struct microcode_amd {
+struct microcode_patch {
void *mpb;
size_t mpb_size;
struct equiv_cpu_entry *equiv_cpu_table;
size_t equiv_cpu_table_size;
};
+#define microcode_amd microcode_patch
+
struct mpbhdr {
uint32_t type;
uint32_t len;
@@ -177,13 +179,11 @@ static enum microcode_match_result micro
static bool match_cpu(const struct microcode_patch *patch)
{
- return patch && (microcode_fits(patch->mc_amd) == NEW_UCODE);
+ return patch && (microcode_fits(patch) == NEW_UCODE);
}
-static void free_patch(void *mc)
+static void free_patch(struct microcode_patch *mc_amd)
{
- struct microcode_amd *mc_amd = mc;
-
if ( mc_amd )
{
xfree(mc_amd->equiv_cpu_table);
@@ -206,12 +206,12 @@ static enum microcode_match_result compa
static enum microcode_match_result compare_patch(
const struct microcode_patch *new, const struct microcode_patch *old)
{
- const struct microcode_header_amd *new_header = new->mc_amd->mpb;
- const struct microcode_header_amd *old_header = old->mc_amd->mpb;
+ const struct microcode_header_amd *new_header = new->mpb;
+ const struct microcode_header_amd *old_header = old->mpb;
/* Both patches to compare are supposed to be applicable to local CPU. */
- ASSERT(microcode_fits(new->mc_amd) != MIS_UCODE);
- ASSERT(microcode_fits(new->mc_amd) != MIS_UCODE);
+ ASSERT(microcode_fits(new) != MIS_UCODE);
+ ASSERT(microcode_fits(new) != MIS_UCODE);
return compare_header(new_header, old_header);
}
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(const struct
if ( !match_cpu(patch) )
return -EINVAL;
- hdr = patch->mc_amd->mpb;
+ hdr = patch->mpb;
BUG_ON(local_irq_is_enabled());
@@ -412,7 +412,6 @@ static struct microcode_patch *cpu_reque
{
struct microcode_amd *mc_amd;
struct microcode_header_amd *saved = NULL;
- struct microcode_patch *patch = NULL;
size_t offset = 0, saved_size = 0;
int error = 0;
unsigned int current_cpu_id;
@@ -559,23 +558,18 @@ static struct microcode_patch *cpu_reque
{
mc_amd->mpb = saved;
mc_amd->mpb_size = saved_size;
- patch = xmalloc(struct microcode_patch);
- if ( patch )
- patch->mc_amd = mc_amd;
- else
- {
- free_patch(mc_amd);
- error = -ENOMEM;
- }
}
else
+ {
free_patch(mc_amd);
+ mc_amd = NULL;
+ }
out:
- if ( error && !patch )
- patch = ERR_PTR(error);
+ if ( error && !mc_amd )
+ mc_amd = ERR_PTR(error);
- return patch;
+ return mc_amd;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HVM
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -245,8 +245,7 @@ static struct microcode_patch *parse_blo
static void microcode_free_patch(struct microcode_patch *microcode_patch)
{
- microcode_ops->free_patch(microcode_patch->mc);
- xfree(microcode_patch);
+ microcode_ops->free_patch(microcode_patch);
}
/* Return true if cache gets updated. Otherwise, return false */
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -52,11 +52,13 @@ struct microcode_header_intel {
unsigned int reserved[3];
};
-struct microcode_intel {
+struct microcode_patch {
struct microcode_header_intel hdr;
unsigned int bits[0];
};
+#define microcode_intel microcode_patch
+
/* microcode format is extended from prescott processors */
struct extended_signature {
unsigned int sig;
@@ -245,12 +247,12 @@ static bool match_cpu(const struct micro
if ( !patch )
return false;
- return microcode_update_match(&patch->mc_intel->hdr) == NEW_UCODE;
+ return microcode_update_match(&patch->hdr) == NEW_UCODE;
}
-static void free_patch(void *mc)
+static void free_patch(struct microcode_patch *patch)
{
- xfree(mc);
+ xfree(patch);
}
static enum microcode_match_result compare_patch(
@@ -260,10 +262,10 @@ static enum microcode_match_result compa
* Both patches to compare are supposed to be applicable to local CPU.
* Just compare the revision number.
*/
- ASSERT(microcode_update_match(&old->mc_intel->hdr) != MIS_UCODE);
- ASSERT(microcode_update_match(&new->mc_intel->hdr) != MIS_UCODE);
+ ASSERT(microcode_update_match(&old->hdr) != MIS_UCODE);
+ ASSERT(microcode_update_match(&new->hdr) != MIS_UCODE);
- return (new->mc_intel->hdr.rev > old->mc_intel->hdr.rev) ? NEW_UCODE
+ return (new->hdr.rev > old->hdr.rev) ? NEW_UCODE
: OLD_UCODE;
}
@@ -281,7 +283,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(const struct
if ( !match_cpu(patch) )
return -EINVAL;
- mc_intel = patch->mc_intel;
+ mc_intel = patch;
BUG_ON(local_irq_is_enabled());
@@ -347,7 +349,6 @@ static struct microcode_patch *cpu_reque
long offset = 0;
int error = 0;
struct microcode_intel *mc, *saved = NULL;
- struct microcode_patch *patch = NULL;
while ( (offset = get_next_ucode_from_buffer(&mc, buf, size, offset)) > 0 )
{
@@ -374,22 +375,10 @@ static struct microcode_patch *cpu_reque
if ( offset < 0 )
error = offset;
- if ( saved )
- {
- patch = xmalloc(struct microcode_patch);
- if ( patch )
- patch->mc_intel = saved;
- else
- {
- xfree(saved);
- error = -ENOMEM;
- }
- }
-
- if ( error && !patch )
- patch = ERR_PTR(error);
+ if ( error && !saved )
+ saved = ERR_PTR(error);
- return patch;
+ return saved;
}
const struct microcode_ops intel_ucode_ops = {
--- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/private.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/microcode/private.h
@@ -11,13 +11,7 @@ enum microcode_match_result {
MIS_UCODE, /* signature mismatched */
};
-struct microcode_patch {
- union {
- struct microcode_intel *mc_intel;
- struct microcode_amd *mc_amd;
- void *mc;
- };
-};
+struct microcode_patch;
struct microcode_ops {
struct microcode_patch *(*cpu_request_microcode)(const void *buf,
@@ -26,7 +20,7 @@ struct microcode_ops {
int (*apply_microcode)(const struct microcode_patch *patch);
int (*start_update)(void);
void (*end_update_percpu)(void);
- void (*free_patch)(void *mc);
+ void (*free_patch)(struct microcode_patch *patch);
bool (*match_cpu)(const struct microcode_patch *patch);
enum microcode_match_result (*compare_patch)(
const struct microcode_patch *new, const struct microcode_patch *old);
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |