Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 09/12] xen: add runtime parameter access support to hypfs

[Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Juergen & Jan,

On 26/02/2020 12:47, Juergen Gross wrote:
> diff --git a/docs/misc/hypfs-paths.pandoc b/docs/misc/hypfs-paths.pandoc
> index 1faebcccbc..b4a5b6086e 100644
> --- a/docs/misc/hypfs-paths.pandoc
> +++ b/docs/misc/hypfs-paths.pandoc
> @@ -152,3 +152,12 @@ The major version of Xen.
>   #### /buildinfo/version/minor = INTEGER
>   
>   The minor version of Xen.
> +
> +#### /params/
> +
> +A directory of runtime parameters.
> +
> +#### /params/*
> +
> +The individual parameters. The description of the different parameters can be
> +found in `docs/misc/xen-command-line.pandoc`.
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S b/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
> index a497f6a48d..0061a8dfea 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/xen.lds.S
> @@ -89,6 +89,11 @@ SECTIONS
>          __start_schedulers_array = .;
>          *(.data.schedulers)
>          __end_schedulers_array = .;
> +
> +       . = ALIGN(8);
Apologies for the late answer. I noticed that Jan asked the following 
question on v5:
"Do you really need 8-byte alignment even on 32-bit Arm?"

We forbid unaligned access on 32-bit Arm (and unaligned access should be 
avoided on 64-bit), so if the structure contains a 64-bit type, then we 
definitely need the data to be 8-byte aligned.
What is the expected alignment of the structure?

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel