[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xen: credit2: avoid vCPUs to ever reach lower credits than idle
On 12.03.2020 14:44, Dario Faggioli wrote: > --- a/xen/common/sched/credit2.c > +++ b/xen/common/sched/credit2.c > @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ > * units does not consume credits, and it must be lower than whatever > * amount of credit 'regular' unit would end up with. > */ > -#define CSCHED2_IDLE_CREDIT (-(1U<<30)) > +#define CSCHED2_IDLE_CREDIT INT_MIN The title saying "lower than", is "equal" actually fine? Looking at e.g. runq_insert() I'm getting the impression it's not. Looking at t2c_update() I'm also getting the impression that there's UB when the subtraction underflows. After all, if -1 << 30 wasn't small enough a value, I don't see why -1 << 31 would be. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |