[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH] credit2: avoid NULL deref in csched2_res_pick() when tracing
The issue here results from one of the downsides of using goto: The early "goto out" and "goto out_up" in the function very clearly bypass any possible initialization of min_rqd, yet the tracing code at the end of the function consumes the value. There's even a comment regarding the trace record not being accurate in this case. CID: 1460432 Fixes: 9c84bc004653 ("sched: rework credit2 run-queue allocation") Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- It took me a little to convince myself that new_cpu = cpumask_cycle(min_rqd->pick_bias, cpumask_scratch_cpu(cpu)); min_rqd->pick_bias = new_cpu; are safe, i.e. min_rqd can't be NULL here. I think though that this could do with making more obvious, at the very least by e.g. @@ -2360,6 +2360,8 @@ unit->cpu_soft_affinity); cpumask_and(cpumask_scratch_cpu(cpu), cpumask_scratch_cpu(cpu), &min_s_rqd->active); + + BUG_ON(!min_rqd); } else if ( min_rqd ) { possibly accompanied by a comment. Thoughts? --- a/xen/common/sched/credit2.c +++ b/xen/common/sched/credit2.c @@ -2403,7 +2403,7 @@ csched2_res_pick(const struct scheduler } d; d.dom = unit->domain->domain_id; d.unit = unit->unit_id; - d.rq_id = min_rqd->id; + d.rq_id = min_rqd ? min_rqd->id : -1; d.b_avgload = min_avgload; d.new_cpu = new_cpu; __trace_var(TRC_CSCHED2_PICKED_CPU, 1, _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |