Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 6/7] x86/hyperv: retrieve vp_index from Hyper-V

["Durrant, Paul" <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: 28 January 2020 16:54
> To: Durrant, Paul <pdurrant@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>; Paul Durrant
> <paul@xxxxxxx>; Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Xen Development
> List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Roger Pau Monné
> <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <liuwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Michael Kelley
> <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 6/7] x86/hyperv: retrieve vp_index from
> Hyper-V
> 
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 04:33:00PM +0000, Durrant, Paul wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Xen-devel <xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of
> Jan
> > > Beulich
> > > Sent: 28 January 2020 16:19
> > > To: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>; Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>; Andrew Cooper
> > > <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Xen Development List <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Roger Pau
> Monné
> > > <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <liuwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Michael Kelley
> > > <mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 6/7] x86/hyperv: retrieve vp_index
> from
> > > Hyper-V
> > >
> > > On 28.01.2020 16:55, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:48:38PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > >> On 22.01.2020 21:23, Wei Liu wrote:
> > > >>> This will be useful when invoking hypercall that targets specific
> > > >>> vcpu(s).
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <liuwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >>> Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@xxxxxxx>
> > > >>
> > > >> For formal reasons
> > > >> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> > > >>
> > > >> However I wonder whether the Viridian entry in MAINTAINERS
> shouldn't
> > > >> be extended by
> > > >>
> > > >> F:     xen/arch/x86/guest/hyperv/
> > > >>
> > > >> (and possibly have its title adjusted). Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > This isn't about emulating Hyper-V inside Xen, so I don't think
> that's
> > > > the right approach here.
> > >
> > > Well, it's the code producing the interface in one case, and
> > > consuming it here. So there is some overlap at least.
> > >
> > > > That said, if Paul wants to take this under his purview, it's fine
> by me
> > > > -- that would make me easier to upstream my patch. ;-)  I also
> wouldn't
> > > > mind adding myself as maintainer for this path.
> > >
> > > Perhaps best both of you? Paul, Andrew, what do you think?
> > >
> >
> > IMO it's probably best to the put the Hyper-V stuff under 'Viridian'
> > and add yourself as a maintainer there. There really is likely to be
> > significant overlap and it'd make it easier (for me at least) to keep
> > track of the bigger picture (i.e. Xen using enlightenments as well as
> > implementing them).
> 
> When you said "yourself", did you mean me or Jan?
>

You. I thought was replying to your question. Apologies for any confusion.

  Paul
 
> Wei.
> 
> >
> >   Cheers,
> >
> >     Paul

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel