|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/5] x86/hyperv: setup hypercall page
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 03:42:14PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 09:57:56PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> [...]
> > >
> > >> The locked bit is probably a good idea, but one aspect missing here is
> > >> the check to see whether the hypercall page is already enabled, which I
> > >> expect is for a kexec crash scenario.
> > >>
> > >> However, the most important point is the one which describes the #GP
> > >> properties of the guest trying to modify the page. This can only be
> > >> achieved with an EPT/NPT mapping lacking the W permission, which will
> > >> shatter host superpages. Therefore, putting it in .text is going to be
> > >> rather poor, perf wise.
> > >>
> > >> I also note that Xen's implementation of the Viridian hypercall page
> > >> doesn't conform to these properties, and wants fixing. It is going to
> > >> need a new kind identification of the page (probably a new p2m type)
> > >> which injects #GP if we ever see an EPT_VIOLATION/NPT_FAULT against it.
> > >>
> > >> As for suggestions here, I'm struggling to find any memory map details
> > >> exposed in the Viridian interface, and therefore which gfn is best to
> > >> choose. I have a sinking feeling that the answer is ACPI...
> > > TLFS only says "go find one suitable page yourself" without further
> > > hints.
> > >
> > > Since we're still quite far away from a functioning system, finding a
> > > most suitable page isn't my top priority at this point. If there is a
> > > simple way to extrapolate suitable information from ACPI, that would be
> > > great. If it requires writing a set of functionalities, than that will
> > > need to wait till later.
> >
> > To cope with the "one is already established and it is already locked"
> > case, the only option is to have a fixmap entry which can be set
> > dynamically. The problem is that the fixmap region is marked NX and 64G
> > away from .text.
> >
> > Possibly the least bad option is to have some build-time space (so 0 or
> > 4k depending on CONFIG_HYPERV) between the per-cpu stubs and
> > XEN_VIRT_END, which operates like the fixmap, but ends up as X/RO mappings.
> >
>
> OK. This is probably not too difficult.
>
I have a closer look at this today and want to make sure I understand
what you had in mind.
Suppose we set aside some space in linker script. Using the following
will give you a WAX section. I still need to add CONFIG_GUEST around it,
but you get the idea.
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S b/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
index 111edb5360..a7af321139 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S
@@ -305,6 +305,15 @@ SECTIONS
. = ALIGN(POINTER_ALIGN);
__bss_end = .;
} :text
+
+ . = ALIGN(SECTION_ALIGN);
+ DECL_SECTION(.text.hypercall_page) {
+ . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
+ __hypercall_page_start = .;
+ . = . + PAGE_SIZE;
+ __hypercall_page_end = .;
+ } :text=0x9090
+
_end = . ;
. = ALIGN(SECTION_ALIGN);
And then? Use map_pages_to_xen(..., PAGE_HYPERVISOR_RX) to point that
address to (MAXPHYSADDR-PAGE_SIZE)?
Wei.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |