[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 for 4.13] x86/microcode: refuse to load the same revision ucode
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 03:41:53PM +0000, Sergey Dyasli wrote: >Currently if a user tries to live-load the same or older ucode revision >than CPU already has, he will get a single message in Xen log like: > > (XEN) 128 cores are to update their microcode > >No actual ucode loading will happen and this situation can be quite >confusing. Fix this by starting ucode update only when the provided >ucode revision is higher than the currently cached one (if any). >This is based on the property that if microcode_cache exists, all CPUs >in the system should have at least that ucode revision. > >Additionally, print a user friendly message if no matching or newer >ucode can be found in the provided blob. This also requires ignoring >-ENODATA in AMD-side code, otherwise the message given to the user is: > > (XEN) Parsing microcode blob error -61 > >Which actually means that a ucode blob was parsed fine, but no matching >ucode was found. > >Signed-off-by: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx> >--- >v2 --> v3: >- move ucode comparison to generic code >- ignore -ENODATA in a different code section > >v1 --> v2: >- compare provided ucode with the currently cached one > >CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> >CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> >CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> >CC: Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> >CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> >--- > xen/arch/x86/microcode.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > xen/arch/x86/microcode_amd.c | 7 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+) > >diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c >index 65d1f41e7c..44efc2d9b3 100644 >--- a/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c >+++ b/xen/arch/x86/microcode.c >@@ -640,10 +640,29 @@ int microcode_update(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(const_void) >buf, unsigned long len) > > if ( !patch ) > { >+ printk(XENLOG_WARNING "microcode: couldn't find any matching ucode in >" >+ "the provided blob!\n"); > ret = -ENOENT; > goto put; > } > >+ /* >+ * If microcode_cache exists, all CPUs in the system should have at least >+ * that ucode revision. >+ */ >+ spin_lock(µcode_mutex); >+ if ( microcode_cache && >+ microcode_ops->compare_patch(patch, microcode_cache) != NEW_UCODE ) >+ { >+ spin_unlock(µcode_mutex); >+ printk(XENLOG_WARNING "microcode: couldn't find any newer revision " >+ "in the provided blob!\n"); The patch needs to be freed. With it fixed, Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks Chao _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |