Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-next v3 6/9] x86: rename hypervisor_{alloc, free}_unused_page

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 21.10.2019 17:57, Wei Liu wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/guest/xen/xen.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/guest/xen/xen.c
> @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static void map_shared_info(void)
>      unsigned int i;
>      unsigned long rc;
>  
> -    if ( hypervisor_alloc_unused_page(&mfn) )
> +    if ( xen_alloc_unused_page(&mfn) )

But is just "xen_" as a prefix a good name in Xen code? Perhaps
"xen_guest_" or (shorter) "xg_"?

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel