[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][next] xen/gntdev: remove redundant non-zero check on ret
- To: Jürgen Groß <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 12:31:30 +0000
- Autocrypt: addr=colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBE6TJCgBEACo6nMNvy06zNKj5tiwDsXXS+LhT+LwtEsy9EnraKYXAf2xwazcICSjX06e fanlyhB0figzQO0n/tP7BcfMVNG7n1+DC71mSyRK1ZERcG1523ajvdZOxbBCTvTitYOy3bjs +LXKqeVMhK3mRvdTjjmVpWnWqJ1LL+Hn12ysDVVfkbtuIm2NoaSEC8Ae8LSSyCMecd22d9Pn LR4UeFgrWEkQsqROq6ZDJT9pBLGe1ZS0pVGhkRyBP9GP65oPev39SmfAx9R92SYJygCy0pPv BMWKvEZS/7bpetPNx6l2xu9UvwoeEbpzUvH26PHO3DDAv0ynJugPCoxlGPVf3zcfGQxy3oty dNTWkP6Wh3Q85m+AlifgKZudjZLrO6c+fAw/jFu1UMjNuyhgShtFU7NvEzL3RqzFf9O1qM2m uj83IeFQ1FZ65QAiCdTa3npz1vHc7N4uEQBUxyXgXfCI+A5yDnjHwzU0Y3RYS52TA3nfa08y LGPLTf5wyAREkFYou20vh5vRvPASoXx6auVf1MuxokDShVhxLpryBnlKCobs4voxN54BUO7m zuERXN8kadsxGFzItAyfKYzEiJrpUB1yhm78AecDyiPlMjl99xXk0zs9lcKriaByVUv/NsyJ FQj/kmdxox3XHi9K29kopFszm1tFiDwCFr/xumbZcMY17Yi2bQARAQABtCVDb2xpbiBLaW5n IDxjb2xpbi5raW5nQGNhbm9uaWNhbC5jb20+iQI2BBMBCAAhBQJOkyQoAhsDBQsJCAcDBRUK CQgLBRYCAwEAAh4BAheAAAoJEGjCh9/GqAImsBcP9i6C/qLewfi7iVcOwqF9avfGzOPf7CVr n8CayQnlWQPchmGKk6W2qgnWI2YLIkADh53TS0VeSQ7Tetj8f1gV75eP0Sr/oT/9ovn38QZ2 vN8hpZp0GxOUrzkvvPjpH+zdmKSaUsHGp8idfPpZX7XeBO0yojAs669+3BrnBcU5wW45SjSV nfmVj1ZZj3/yBunb+hgNH1QRcm8ZPICpjvSsGFClTdB4xu2AR28eMiL/TTg9k8Gt72mOvhf0 fS0/BUwcP8qp1TdgOFyiYpI8CGyzbfwwuGANPSupGaqtIRVf+/KaOdYUM3dx/wFozZb93Kws gXR4z6tyvYCkEg3x0Xl9BoUUyn9Jp5e6FOph2t7TgUvv9dgQOsZ+V9jFJplMhN1HPhuSnkvP 5/PrX8hNOIYuT/o1AC7K5KXQmr6hkkxasjx16PnCPLpbCF5pFwcXc907eQ4+b/42k+7E3fDA Erm9blEPINtt2yG2UeqEkL+qoebjFJxY9d4r8PFbEUWMT+t3+dmhr/62NfZxrB0nTHxDVIia u8xM+23iDRsymnI1w0R78yaa0Eea3+f79QsoRW27Kvu191cU7QdW1eZm05wO8QUvdFagVVdW Zg2DE63Fiin1AkGpaeZG9Dw8HL3pJAJiDe0KOpuq9lndHoGHs3MSa3iyQqpQKzxM6sBXWGfk EkK5Ag0ETpMkKAEQAMX6HP5zSoXRHnwPCIzwz8+inMW7mJ60GmXSNTOCVoqExkopbuUCvinN 4Tg+AnhnBB3R1KTHreFGoz3rcV7fmJeut6CWnBnGBtsaW5Emmh6gZbO5SlcTpl7QDacgIUuT v1pgewVHCcrKiX0zQDJkcK8FeLUcB2PXuJd6sJg39kgsPlI7R0OJCXnvT/VGnd3XPSXXoO4K cr5fcjsZPxn0HdYCvooJGI/Qau+imPHCSPhnX3WY/9q5/WqlY9cQA8tUC+7mgzt2VMjFft1h rp/CVybW6htm+a1d4MS4cndORsWBEetnC6HnQYwuC4bVCOEg9eXMTv88FCzOHnMbE+PxxHzW 3Gzor/QYZGcis+EIiU6hNTwv4F6fFkXfW6611JwfDUQCAHoCxF3B13xr0BH5d2EcbNB6XyQb IGngwDvnTyKHQv34wE+4KtKxxyPBX36Z+xOzOttmiwiFWkFp4c2tQymHAV70dsZTBB5Lq06v 6nJs601Qd6InlpTc2mjd5mRZUZ48/Y7i+vyuNVDXFkwhYDXzFRotO9VJqtXv8iqMtvS4xPPo 2DtJx6qOyDE7gnfmk84IbyDLzlOZ3k0p7jorXEaw0bbPN9dDpw2Sh9TJAUZVssK119DJZXv5 2BSc6c+GtMqkV8nmWdakunN7Qt/JbTcKlbH3HjIyXBy8gXDaEto5ABEBAAGJAh8EGAEIAAkF Ak6TJCgCGwwACgkQaMKH38aoAiZ4lg/+N2mkx5vsBmcsZVd3ys3sIsG18w6RcJZo5SGMxEBj t1UgyIXWI9lzpKCKIxKx0bskmEyMy4tPEDSRfZno/T7p1mU7hsM4owi/ic0aGBKP025Iok9G LKJcooP/A2c9dUV0FmygecRcbIAUaeJ27gotQkiJKbi0cl2gyTRlolKbC3R23K24LUhYfx4h pWj8CHoXEJrOdHO8Y0XH7059xzv5oxnXl2SD1dqA66INnX+vpW4TD2i+eQNPgfkECzKzGj+r KRfhdDZFBJj8/e131Y0t5cu+3Vok1FzBwgQqBnkA7dhBsQm3V0R8JTtMAqJGmyOcL+JCJAca 3Yi81yLyhmYzcRASLvJmoPTsDp2kZOdGr05Dt8aGPRJL33Jm+igfd8EgcDYtG6+F8MCBOult TTAu+QAijRPZv1KhEJXwUSke9HZvzo1tNTlY3h6plBsBufELu0mnqQvHZmfa5Ay99dF+dL1H WNp62+mTeHsX6v9EACH4S+Cw9Q1qJElFEu9/1vFNBmGY2vDv14gU2xEiS2eIvKiYl/b5Y85Q QLOHWV8up73KK5Qq/6bm4BqVd1rKGI9un8kezUQNGBKre2KKs6wquH8oynDP/baoYxEGMXBg GF/qjOC6OY+U7kNUW3N/A7J3M2VdOTLu3hVTzJMZdlMmmsg74azvZDV75dUigqXcwjE=
- Cc: kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 12:31:38 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 11/11/2019 12:25, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 11.11.19 13:20, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The non-zero check on ret is always going to be false because
>> ret was initialized as zero and the only place it is set to
>> non-zero contains a return path before the non-zero check. Hence
>> the check is redundant and can be removed.
>
> Which version did you patch against? In current master the above
> statement is not true.
against today's linux-next
Colin
>
>
> Juergen
>
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/xen/gntdev.c | 5 -----
>> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
>> index 10cc5e9e612a..07d80b176118 100644
>> --- a/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/gntdev.c
>> @@ -524,11 +524,6 @@ static int gntdev_open(struct inode *inode,
>> struct file *flip)
>> }
>> #endif
>> - if (ret) {
>> - kfree(priv);
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> -
>> flip->private_data = priv;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_XEN_GRANT_DMA_ALLOC
>> priv->dma_dev = gntdev_miscdev.this_device;
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
