[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Errors with Loading Xen at a Certain Address
Hi, On 10/2/19 7:56 PM, Brian Woods wrote: On 10/2/19 5:52 PM, Julien Grall wrote:On 10/2/19 1:32 AM, Brian Woods wrote:Hello,Hi Brian, Thank you for report. I guess this Arm specific, right? If so, please try to CC the relevant maintainers and possibly add "arm" in the subject to avoid any delay (Xen-Devel has quite an high volume of e-mail!). May I also ask to avoiding sending attachment on the mailing list and instead upload the log somewhere (e.g. pastebin, your own webserver...)?I did include all the ARM maintainers, although I forgot to CC Volodymyr. Sorry about that. Hmmm, the first e-mail didn't land in my inbox directly (I have a filter send to a separate directory any e-mail I not CCed on). Did you BCC me by any change? Also, I'm not sure if this is strictly an ARM or general Xen bug so I left ARM. I guess I should have mentioned that in the email though. Let see try to troubleshoot it first :). I prefer having them as attachments due to the fact I can see everything in mutt. Although if there's a strong community consensus that logs shouldn't be emailed as attachments, I will start using a pastebin like service to post them. Well, any attachment you send on the ML will store to each subscribers mailbox. I let you do the math here ;) So yeah, pastebin is always the preferred way when you have to send the full log. While testing some things out, I found a possible bug in Xen. Xen would successfully run when loaded (from u-boot) at some addresses but not others. I didn't observe this issue in 4.11 stable, so I did a bisect and found that: commit f60658c6ae47e74792e6cc48ea2effac8bb52826 Author: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue Dec 18 13:07:39 2018 +0000 xen/arm: Stop relocating Xen was what was causing it to fail when it was loaded to that certain address.This patch is basically changing how Xen is using the physical address space. So it exercise more part of Xen code and most likely a red-herring :). However, the logs are quite interesting: (XEN) pg[0] MFN 01533 c=0x180000000000000 o=0 v=0x7ffff t=0 If I am not mistaken, the page state is PGC_state_free. So this seems to suggest that the page were already handed over to the allocator. Would you mind to apply the patch below and paste the log? Hopefully, you see see two WARN_ON() before Xen is crashing. Note the patch is assuming the MFN will stay the same after the patch has been applied. If not, you may need to slightly tweak it. diff --git a/xen/common/page_alloc.c b/xen/common/page_alloc.c index 7cb1bd368b..4bf0dbc727 100644 --- a/xen/common/page_alloc.c +++ b/xen/common/page_alloc.c @@ -1389,6 +1389,9 @@ static void free_heap_pages( for ( i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++ ) { + + WARN_ON(mfn_x(page_to_mfn(pg + 1)) == 0x01533); + /* * Cannot assume that count_info == 0, as there are some corner cases * where it isn't the case and yet it isn't a bug: Cheers, -- Julien GrallAttached are the logs of loading patched Xen at the good and bad address. It appears the MFN has stayed the same, although there's only one WARN message for both the good and bad address. Thank you for the log. So that's probably not a double-init then.Looking back at the log, the values look quite sane. So I am not entirely sure what is happening. I would check that the frametable is correctly zeroed. You could add a print at the end of setup_frametable_mappings(...) to dump the count_info for the page. Something like: mfn_to_page(_mfn(0x01533))->count_info; If it is correctly initialized, it should be zero.The next step would be to add a similar print in start_xen() (xen/arch/arm/setup.c) and see where the value is not 0 anymore. Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |