[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86/crash: force unlock console before printing on kexec crash
On 01/10/2019 20:48, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 01/10/2019 20:15, Igor Druzhinin wrote: >> There is a small window where shootdown NMI might come to a CPU >> (e.g. in serial interrupt handler) where console lock is taken. In order >> not to leave following console prints waiting infinitely for shot down >> CPUs to free the lock - force unlock the console. >> >> The race has been frequently observed while crashing nested Xen in >> an HVM domain. >> >> Signed-off-by: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> xen/arch/x86/crash.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/crash.c b/xen/arch/x86/crash.c >> index 6e1d3d3..a20ec8a 100644 >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/crash.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/crash.c >> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ >> #include <asm/io_apic.h> >> #include <xen/iommu.h> >> #include <asm/hpet.h> >> +#include <xen/console.h> >> >> static cpumask_t waiting_to_crash; >> static unsigned int crashing_cpu; >> @@ -155,6 +156,7 @@ static void nmi_shootdown_cpus(void) >> } >> >> /* Leave a hint of how well we did trying to shoot down the other cpus >> */ >> + console_force_unlock(); >> if ( cpumask_empty(&waiting_to_crash) ) >> printk("Shot down all CPUs\n"); >> else > > The overall change, R-by me, but I'd prefer something along the lines of: > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/crash.c b/xen/arch/x86/crash.c > index 6e1d3d3a84..41687465ac 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/crash.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/crash.c > @@ -154,6 +154,12 @@ static void nmi_shootdown_cpus(void) > msecs--; > } > > + /* > + * We may have NMI'd another CPU while it was holding the console lock. > + * It won't be in a position to release the lock... > + */ > + console_force_unlock(); > + > /* Leave a hint of how well we did trying to shoot down the other > cpus */ > if ( cpumask_empty(&waiting_to_crash) ) > printk("Shot down all CPUs\n"); > > > If you're happy, I can fold this in on commit. Have no objections but there are other places we call console_force_unlock() for similar purposes and those don't have explanatory comments like that. From my point of view the reason here is kind of obvious but if you prefer... Igor _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |