[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/iommu: fix hwdom iommu requirements check
> -----Original Message----- > From: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: 28 September 2019 09:27 > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>; > Paul Durrant > <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>; Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH] x86/iommu: fix hwdom iommu requirements check > > Both a shadow and a HAP hwdom require an iommu and must be run in > strict mode. Change the HAP check into a hvm domain check. > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> Yes, I completely forgot that it is legitimate for a PVH dom0 to operate in shadow mode. Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > index 8b550f909b..9ef5f376c5 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c > @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ custom_param("dom0-iommu", parse_dom0_iommu_param); > > static void __hwdom_init check_hwdom_reqs(struct domain *d) > { > - if ( iommu_hwdom_none || !hap_enabled(d) ) > + if ( iommu_hwdom_none || !is_hvm_domain(d) ) > return; > > iommu_hwdom_passthrough = false; > -- > 2.23.0 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |