[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 5/8] xen/arm: assign devices to boot domains
On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On 25/09/2019 19:49, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Scan the user provided dtb fragment at boot. For each device node, map > > memory to guests, and route interrupts and setup the iommu. > > > > The memory region to remap is specified by the "xen,reg" property. > > > > The iommu is setup by passing the node of the device to assign on the > > host device tree. The path is specified in the device tree fragment as > > the "xen,path" string property. > > > > The interrupts are remapped based on the information from the > > corresponding node on the host device tree. Call > > handle_device_interrupts to remap interrupts. Interrupts related device > > tree properties are copied from the device tree fragment, same as all > > the other properties. > > > > Also add the new flag XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_iommu to that dom0less domU can use > > the IOMMU. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Changes in v5: > > - use local variable for name > > - use map_regions_p2mt > > - add warning for not page aligned addresses/sizes > > - introduce handle_passthrough_prop > > > > Changes in v4: > > - use unsigned > > - improve commit message > > - code style > > - use dt_prop_cmp > > - use device_tree_get_reg > > - don't copy over xen,reg and xen,path > > - don't create special interrupt properties for domU: copy them from the > > fragment > > - in-code comment > > > > Changes in v3: > > - improve commit message > > - remove superfluous cast > > - merge code with the copy code > > - add interrup-parent > > - demove depth > 2 check > > - reuse code from handle_device_interrupts > > - copy interrupts from host dt > > > > Changes in v2: > > - rename "path" to "xen,path" > > - grammar fix > > - use gaddr_to_gfn and maddr_to_mfn > > - remove depth <= 2 limitation in scanning the dtb fragment > > - introduce and parse xen,reg > > - code style > > - support more than one interrupt per device > > - specify only the GIC is supported > > --- > > xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > > index 9d985d3bbe..414893bc24 100644 > > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c > > @@ -1701,6 +1701,85 @@ static int __init make_vpl011_uart_node(struct > > kernel_info *kinfo) > > } > > #endif > > > > +/* > > + * Scan device tree properties for passthrough specific information. > > + * Returns -ENOENT when no passthrough properties are found > > + * < 0 on error > > + * 0 on success > > + */ > > +static int __init handle_passthrough_prop(struct kernel_info *kinfo, > > + const struct fdt_property *prop, > > + const char *name, > > + uint32_t address_cells, uint32_t > > size_cells) > > +{ > > + const __be32 *cell; > > + unsigned int i, len; > > + struct dt_device_node *node; > > + int res; > > + > > + /* xen,reg specifies where to map the MMIO region */ > > + if ( dt_prop_cmp("xen,reg", name) == 0 ) > > + { > > + paddr_t mstart, size, gstart; > > + cell = (const __be32 *)prop->data; > > + len = fdt32_to_cpu(prop->len) / > > + ((address_cells * 2 + size_cells) * sizeof(uint32_t)); > > + > > + for ( i = 0; i < len; i++ ) > > + { > > + device_tree_get_reg(&cell, address_cells, size_cells, > > + &mstart, &size); > > + gstart = dt_next_cell(address_cells, &cell); > > + > > + if ( gstart & ~PAGE_MASK || mstart & ~PAGE_MASK || size & > > ~PAGE_MASK ) > > + dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING, > > + "DomU passthrough config has not page aligned > > addresses/sizes\n"); > > I don't think this is wise to continue, the more this is a printk that > can only happen in debug build. So someone using a release build may not > notice the error. > > So I think this wants to be a printk(XENLOG_ERR,...) and also return an > error. I'll fix the code style issues, use printk instead of dprintk and return error here. > > + > > + res = map_regions_p2mt(kinfo->d, > > + gaddr_to_gfn(gstart), > > + PFN_DOWN(size), > > + maddr_to_mfn(mstart), > > + p2m_mmio_direct_dev); > > Coding style. > > > + if ( res < 0 ) > > + { > > + dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, > > + "Failed to map %"PRIpaddr" to the guest > > at%"PRIpaddr"\n", > > + mstart, gstart); > > Similarly, this wants to be a printk. > > > + return -EFAULT; > > + } > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > + } > > + /* > > + * xen,path specifies the corresponding node in the host DT. > > + * Both interrupt mappings and IOMMU settings are based on it, > > + * as they are done based on the corresponding host DT node. > > + */ > > + else if ( dt_prop_cmp("xen,path", name) == 0 ) > > + { > > + node = dt_find_node_by_path(prop->data); > > + if ( node == NULL ) > > + { > > + dprintk(XENLOG_ERR, "Couldn't find node %s in host_dt!\n", > > + (char *)prop->data); > > Same here. > > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + res = iommu_assign_dt_device(kinfo->d, node); > > + if ( res < 0 ) > > + return res; > > + > > + res = handle_device_interrupts(kinfo->d, node, true); > > + if ( res < 0 ) > > + return res; > > + > > + return 0; > > + } > > + > > + return -ENOENT; > > +} > > + > > static int __init handle_prop_pfdt(struct kernel_info *kinfo, > > const void *pfdt, int nodeoff, > > uint32_t address_cells, uint32_t > > size_cells, > > @@ -1709,6 +1788,7 @@ static int __init handle_prop_pfdt(struct kernel_info > > *kinfo, > > void *fdt = kinfo->fdt; > > int propoff, nameoff, res; > > const struct fdt_property *prop; > > + const char *name; > > > > for ( propoff = fdt_first_property_offset(pfdt, nodeoff); > > propoff >= 0; > > @@ -1717,11 +1797,23 @@ static int __init handle_prop_pfdt(struct > > kernel_info *kinfo, > > if ( !(prop = fdt_get_property_by_offset(pfdt, propoff, NULL)) ) > > return -FDT_ERR_INTERNAL; > > > > + res = 0; > > nameoff = fdt32_to_cpu(prop->nameoff); > > - res = fdt_property(fdt, fdt_string(pfdt, nameoff), > > - prop->data, fdt32_to_cpu(prop->len)); > > - if ( res ) > > + name = fdt_string(pfdt, nameoff); > > + > > + if ( scan_passthrough_prop ) > > + res = handle_passthrough_prop(kinfo, prop, name, > > + address_cells, size_cells); > > + if ( res < 0 && res != -ENOENT ) > > return res; > > + > > + /* copy all other properties */ > > + if ( !scan_passthrough_prop || res == -ENOENT ) > > + { > > + res = fdt_property(fdt, name, prop->data, > > fdt32_to_cpu(prop->len)); > > + if ( res ) > > + return res; > > + } > > } > > > > /* FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND => There is no more properties for this node */ > > @@ -2254,7 +2346,8 @@ void __init create_domUs(void) > > struct xen_domctl_createdomain d_cfg = { > > .arch.gic_version = XEN_DOMCTL_CONFIG_GIC_NATIVE, > > .arch.nr_spis = 0, > > - .flags = XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_hvm | XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_hap, > > + .flags = XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_hvm | XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_hap | > > + XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_iommu, > > This will break dom0less on platform without an IOMMU because setting > CDF_iommu for them will be invalid. > > I also don't think this is wise to always enable the IOMMU. This should > only be done if there is a partial device-tree present (most likely it > means passthrough will be used). That's interesting, good idea, I'll do that _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |