[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH for-next 09/18] x86/mem_sharing: Use INVALID_MFN and p2m_is_shared in relinquish_shared_pages



While using _mfn(0) is of no consequence during teardown, INVALID_MFN is the
correct value that should be used.

Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tamas.lengyel@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c
index d5ecb77679..60057fd3ed 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_sharing.c
@@ -1317,7 +1317,7 @@ int relinquish_shared_pages(struct domain *d)
             break;
 
         mfn = p2m->get_entry(p2m, _gfn(gfn), &t, &a, 0, NULL, NULL);
-        if ( mfn_valid(mfn) && t == p2m_ram_shared )
+        if ( mfn_valid(mfn) && p2m_is_shared(t) )
         {
             /* Does not fail with ENOMEM given the DESTROY flag */
             BUG_ON(__mem_sharing_unshare_page(d, gfn,
@@ -1327,7 +1327,7 @@ int relinquish_shared_pages(struct domain *d)
              * unshare.  Must succeed: we just read the old entry and
              * we hold the p2m lock.
              */
-            set_rc = p2m->set_entry(p2m, _gfn(gfn), _mfn(0), PAGE_ORDER_4K,
+            set_rc = p2m->set_entry(p2m, _gfn(gfn), INVALID_MFN, PAGE_ORDER_4K,
                                     p2m_invalid, p2m_access_rwx, -1);
             ASSERT(!set_rc);
             count += 0x10;
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.