Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v13 0/4] add per-domain IOMMU control

[Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 25 September 2019 09:51
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Petre Pircalabu 
> <ppircalabu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Andrew Cooper
> <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
> George Dunlap
> <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Roger Pau 
> Monne
> <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>; Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>; 
> Stefano Stabellini
> <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; KonradRzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>; 
> David Scott
> <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tim (Xen.org) 
> <tim@xxxxxxx>; Wei Liu
> <wl@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v13 0/4] add per-domain IOMMU control
> 
> On 25.09.2019 10:40, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > Ping? I don't think this series is awaiting any more acks.
> 
> I did enumerate the other day on irc what is still missing according
> to my records.

Oh, I must have dropped off an missed that. Connectivity can be somewhat flakey 
here in the office :-(

> Would you mind pointing me at a libxl maintainer ack
> for patch 1? I think I've managed to spot the missing one for patch 3,
> which hung off a "REPOST" thread. And I realize I was wrongly looking
> for a tool stack maintainer ack for patch 4, when a libxl one is
> sufficient and already there.

I thought I'd had an toolstack ack on patch #1 but now that I look again, 
you're right... it's still missing. I'll chase that one.

Thanks,

  Paul

> 
> Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel