[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 00/47] xen: add core scheduling support
- To: Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@xxxxxxxx>, Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx>, Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Igor Druzhinin <igor.druzhinin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:42:01 +0100
- Authentication-results: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=igor.druzhinin@xxxxxxxxxx; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=igor.druzhinin@xxxxxxxxxx; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>, Robert VanVossen <robert.vanvossen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>, Josh Whitehead <josh.whitehead@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Meng Xu <mengxu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 17:42:12 +0000
- Ironport-sdr: RFmgmTdtH8PIVj92RvA6L2FuY51X7g7AKSyrXLlWV0oJFuOrYx9W4q9APSYHfHLIL5G96QgC2e cqi7G9qB4p/yp+horsOaxZLp7phSttGUSn80K1rdctE+y910JB7K76rUwLzHFKdBKNX3D0bd9n mk/0tv8PXmC50oN1SPLSDCEpdLnhIirJaHNX7o0fHLPrz+JsBpcZwhTS6ZT99ouDrfYQmccuxf oL5ez9dLZtv2R0HRZaE0xuyPUIveGKkSUXwxmovALsNGkyv2w8G+bIGKByvolux9BaSPXR82PY ESM=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 24/09/2019 18:29, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 12:15 +0100, Sergey Dyasli wrote:
>> Hi Juergen,
>>
>> After an extensive testing of your jgross1/sched-v3 branch in XenRT,
>> I'm happy to say that we've found no functional regressions so far
>> when running in the default (thread/cpu) mode.
>>
>> Hopefully this gives some level of confidence to this series and the
>> plan about including it into 4.13 [1]
>>
> Thanks a lot for doing this, and for letting us know.
Additionally, we've got performance test results today and they showed
no noticeable regressions in thread mode against 4.13 without
core-scheduling patches.
> Can I ask whether the tests were done using Credit2 (i.e., upstream
> default) or Credit1, as scheduler?
>
That was Credit1 that we use in the product.
Igor
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
