[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V5 7/8] iommu/arm: Introduce iommu_add_dt_device API
Hi,
On 9/24/19 4:30 PM, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote:
@@ -1263,15 +1264,22 @@ static int __init handle_device(struct domain *d,
struct dt_device_node *dev,
dt_dprintk("%s passthrough = %d nirq = %d naddr = %u\n",
dt_node_full_name(dev), need_mapping, nirq, naddr);
- if ( dt_device_is_protected(dev) && need_mapping )
+ if ( need_mapping )
{
- dt_dprintk("%s setup iommu\n", dt_node_full_name(dev));
- res = iommu_assign_dt_device(d, dev);
- if ( res )
- {
- printk(XENLOG_ERR "Failed to setup the IOMMU for %s\n",
+ dt_dprintk("Check if %s is behind the IOMMU and add it\n",
dt_node_full_name(dev));
- return res;
+
+ iommu_add_dt_device(dev);
Return value should always be checked or explain why this is not done.
[...]
int iommu_do_dt_domctl(struct xen_domctl *domctl, struct domain *d,
XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t) u_domctl)
{
@@ -177,6 +241,13 @@ int iommu_do_dt_domctl(struct xen_domctl *domctl, struct
domain *d,
break;
}
+ iommu_add_dt_device(dev);
Same here.
+ if ( !dt_device_is_protected(dev) )
+ {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ }
This is already checked in iommu_assign_dt_device().
Cheers,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|