|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 6/8] AMD/IOMMU: tidy struct ivrs_mappings
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xen-devel <xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Jan
> Beulich
> Sent: 19 September 2019 14:24
> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Suravee Suthikulpanit
> <suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 6/8] AMD/IOMMU: tidy struct ivrs_mappings
>
> Move the device flags field up into an unused hole, thus shrinking
> overall structure size by 8 bytes. Use bool and uint<N>_t as
> appropriate. Drop pointless (redundant) initializations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
...although I wonder...
> ---
> v6: New.
>
> ---
> xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c | 6 +++---
> xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c | 6 ------
> xen/include/asm-x86/amd-iommu.h | 17 +++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_acpi.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void __init reserve_unity_map_for
> /* extend r/w permissioms and keep aggregate */
> ivrs_mappings[bdf].write_permission = iw;
> ivrs_mappings[bdf].read_permission = ir;
> - ivrs_mappings[bdf].unity_map_enable = IOMMU_CONTROL_ENABLED;
> + ivrs_mappings[bdf].unity_map_enable = true;
> ivrs_mappings[bdf].addr_range_start = base;
> ivrs_mappings[bdf].addr_range_length = length;
> }
> @@ -242,8 +242,8 @@ static int __init register_exclusion_ran
> if ( limit >= iommu_top )
> {
> reserve_iommu_exclusion_range(iommu, base, limit);
> - ivrs_mappings[bdf].dte_allow_exclusion = IOMMU_CONTROL_ENABLED;
> - ivrs_mappings[req].dte_allow_exclusion = IOMMU_CONTROL_ENABLED;
> + ivrs_mappings[bdf].dte_allow_exclusion = true;
> + ivrs_mappings[req].dte_allow_exclusion = true;
> }
>
> return 0;
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c
> @@ -1222,12 +1222,6 @@ static int __init alloc_ivrs_mappings(u1
> for ( bdf = 0; bdf < ivrs_bdf_entries; bdf++ )
> {
> ivrs_mappings[bdf].dte_requestor_id = bdf;
> - ivrs_mappings[bdf].dte_allow_exclusion = IOMMU_CONTROL_DISABLED;
> - ivrs_mappings[bdf].unity_map_enable = IOMMU_CONTROL_DISABLED;
> - ivrs_mappings[bdf].iommu = NULL;
> -
> - ivrs_mappings[bdf].intremap_table = NULL;
> - ivrs_mappings[bdf].device_flags = 0;
>
> if ( amd_iommu_perdev_intremap )
> spin_lock_init(&ivrs_mappings[bdf].intremap_lock);
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/amd-iommu.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/amd-iommu.h
> @@ -106,12 +106,16 @@ struct amd_iommu {
> };
>
> struct ivrs_mappings {
> - u16 dte_requestor_id;
> - u8 dte_allow_exclusion;
> - u8 unity_map_enable;
> - u8 write_permission;
> - u8 read_permission;
> + uint16_t dte_requestor_id;
> bool valid;
> + bool dte_allow_exclusion;
> + bool unity_map_enable;
> + bool write_permission;
> + bool read_permission;
Could you shrink this even more by using a bit-field instead of this sequence
of bools?
> +
> + /* ivhd device data settings */
> + uint8_t device_flags;
> +
> unsigned long addr_range_start;
> unsigned long addr_range_length;
> struct amd_iommu *iommu;
> @@ -120,9 +124,6 @@ struct ivrs_mappings {
> void *intremap_table;
> unsigned long *intremap_inuse;
> spinlock_t intremap_lock;
> -
> - /* ivhd device data settings */
> - u8 device_flags;
> };
>
> extern unsigned int ivrs_bdf_entries;
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |