|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 04/11] ioreq: add fields to allow internal ioreq servers
On 03.09.2019 18:14, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/domain.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/domain.h
> @@ -52,21 +52,29 @@ struct hvm_ioreq_vcpu {
> #define MAX_NR_IO_RANGES 256
>
> struct hvm_ioreq_server {
> - struct domain *target, *emulator;
> -
> + struct domain *target;
> /* Lock to serialize toolstack modifications */
> spinlock_t lock;
> -
> - struct hvm_ioreq_page ioreq;
> - struct list_head ioreq_vcpu_list;
> - struct hvm_ioreq_page bufioreq;
> -
> - /* Lock to serialize access to buffered ioreq ring */
> - spinlock_t bufioreq_lock;
> - evtchn_port_t bufioreq_evtchn;
> struct rangeset *range[NR_IO_RANGE_TYPES];
> bool enabled;
> - uint8_t bufioreq_handling;
> +
> + union {
> + struct {
> + struct domain *emulator;
> + struct hvm_ioreq_page ioreq;
> + struct list_head ioreq_vcpu_list;
> + struct hvm_ioreq_page bufioreq;
> +
> + /* Lock to serialize access to buffered ioreq ring */
> + spinlock_t bufioreq_lock;
> + evtchn_port_t bufioreq_evtchn;
> + uint8_t bufioreq_handling;
> + };
> + struct {
> + void *data;
> + int (*handler)(struct vcpu *v, ioreq_t *, void *);
If you omit the latter two parameter names, the first one should
be omitted, too. And if there was to be any inconsistency in this
regard, then the one parameter where the type doesn't immediately
clarify the purpose would be the one to have a name.
As to the struct vcpu * parameter - is there an expectation that
the handler would be called with this being other than "current"?
If not, the parameter would want to either be dropped, or be
named "curr".
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |