[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] tools/ocaml: Introduce xenctrl ABI build-time checks
Christian Lindig writes ("Re: [PATCH 3/3] tools/ocaml: Introduce xenctrl ABI build-time checks"): > I understand the desire to automate this but would have kept the > original proposal for these reasons: changes are rare enough, it is > obvious how to extend the scheme, the approach stayed well within > the respective languages. Adding parsers and code generators to the > build system will make it more difficult to improve it, which at > least for the OCaml part is very desirable. However, I’m not going > to object to the patch. I would love to have this all done in a more "proper" way. However, in the meantime I do think it is essential to have a check which actually ties the ocaml code right back to the Xen headers (the latter being the canonical ABI definition). Indeed the v1 patch in this very thread had a mismatch between the ocaml and the BUILD_BUG_ON list, which I only discovered when my checker threw an unexpected error. If there are other language bindings which have similar issues we should check them too. Ultimately I would prefer it if the Xen ABI were provided in a way that was useable for automatically generating bindings. > Acked-by: Christian Lindig <christian.lindig@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |