[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v8 5/6] iommu: tidy up iommu_use_hap_pt() and need_iommu_pt_sync() macros
Hi Paul, On 9/6/19 8:59 AM, Paul Durrant wrote: -----Original Message----- From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> Sent: 05 September 2019 20:38 To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>; Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>; Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>; Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>; Tim (Xen.org) <tim@xxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>; Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>; Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] iommu: tidy up iommu_use_hap_pt() and need_iommu_pt_sync() macros Hi Paul, On 9/2/19 3:50 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:Thes macros really ought to live in the common xen/iommu.h header rather then being distributed amongst architecture specific iommu headers and xen/sched.h. This patch moves them there. NOTE: Disabling 'sharept' in the command line iommu options should really be hard error on ARM (as opposed to just being ignored), so define 'iommu_hap_pt_share' to be true for ARM then then gate parsing the command line option on '#ifndef iommu_hap_pt_share'. Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> --- Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> Cc: Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx> Cc: Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx> Cc: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> Previously part of https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-07/msg02267.html v7: - Re-work the ARM handling of 'sharept' as suggested by Jan - Make sure that need_iommu_pt_sync() always evaluates its argument --- xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c | 8 +++++++- xen/include/asm-arm/iommu.h | 3 --- xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h | 4 ---- xen/include/xen/iommu.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- xen/include/xen/sched.h | 6 ------ 5 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c index 4f71db95ea..aaf3b9fac0 100644 --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/iommu.c @@ -49,7 +49,11 @@ int8_t __hwdom_initdata iommu_hwdom_reserved = -1; * default until we find a good solution to resolve it. */ bool_t __read_mostly iommu_intpost; -bool_t __read_mostly iommu_hap_pt_share = 1; + +#ifndef iommu_hap_pt_share +bool __read_mostly iommu_hap_pt_share = true; +#endif + bool_t __read_mostly iommu_debug; bool_t __read_mostly amd_iommu_perdev_intremap = 1; @@ -102,8 +106,10 @@ static int __init parse_iommu_param(const char *s) iommu_hwdom_passthrough = val; else if ( (val = parse_boolean("dom0-strict", s, ss)) >= 0 ) iommu_hwdom_strict = val; +#ifndef iommu_hap_pt_share else if ( (val = parse_boolean("sharept", s, ss)) >= 0 ) iommu_hap_pt_share = val; +#endif else rc = -EINVAL; diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/iommu.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/iommu.h index 1577e83d2b..77a94b29eb 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/iommu.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/iommu.h @@ -20,9 +20,6 @@ struct arch_iommu void *priv; }; -/* Always share P2M Table between the CPU and the IOMMU */ -#define iommu_use_hap_pt(d) is_iommu_enabled(d) - const struct iommu_ops *iommu_get_ops(void); void iommu_set_ops(const struct iommu_ops *ops); diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h index 5071afd6a5..85741f7c96 100644 --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/iommu.h @@ -86,10 +86,6 @@ struct iommu_init_ops { extern const struct iommu_init_ops *iommu_init_ops; -/* Are we using the domain P2M table as its IOMMU pagetable? */ -#define iommu_use_hap_pt(d) \ - (hap_enabled(d) && is_iommu_enabled(d) && iommu_hap_pt_share) - void iommu_update_ire_from_apic(unsigned int apic, unsigned int reg, unsigned int value); unsigned int iommu_read_apic_from_ire(unsigned int apic, unsigned int reg); int iommu_setup_hpet_msi(struct msi_desc *); diff --git a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h index 4b6871936c..87f9129b99 100644 --- a/xen/include/xen/iommu.h +++ b/xen/include/xen/iommu.h @@ -55,7 +55,13 @@ static inline bool_t dfn_eq(dfn_t x, dfn_t y) extern bool_t iommu_enable, iommu_enabled; extern bool_t force_iommu, iommu_verbose, iommu_igfx; extern bool_t iommu_snoop, iommu_qinval, iommu_intremap, iommu_intpost; -extern bool_t iommu_hap_pt_share; + +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM +#define iommu_hap_pt_share true +#else +extern bool iommu_hap_pt_share; +#endifI don't particularly like #ifdef CONFIG_<ARCH> in common header. How about other arch? I can see two solutions: 1) Move the define in asm/iommu.h. This would require to move the declaration a bit later and then protect as you did in iommu.c 2) Replace CONFIG_ARM with a new Kconfig selected by Arm only so far.I had wondered about a Kconfig but I can't really think of a good name. How about CONFIG_FORCE_PT_SHARE? I would add "IOMMU" in the name just to make clear this is related to IOMMU. So maybe CONFIG_IOMMU_FORCE_PT_SHARE. Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |