[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/5] x86/boot: Copy 16-bit boot variables back up to Xen image
On 21.08.2019 18:35, David Woodhouse wrote: > From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Ditch the bootsym() access from C code for the variables populated by > 16-bit boot code. As well as being cleaner this also paves the way for > not having the 16-bit boot code in low memory for no-real-mode or EFI > loader boots at all. > > These variables are put into a separate .data.boot16 section and > accessed in low memory during the real-mode boot, then copied back to > their native location in the Xen image when real mode has finished. > > Fix the limit in gdt_48 to admit that trampoline_gdt actually includes > 7 entries, since we do now use the seventh (BOOT_FS) in late code so it > matters. Andrew has a patch to further tidy up the GDT and initialise > accessed bits etc., so I won't go overboard with more than the trivial > size fix for now. > > The bootsym() macro remains in C code purely for the variables which > are written for the later AP startup and wakeup trampoline to use. > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > xen/arch/x86/boot/edd.S | 2 ++ > xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S | 16 +++++++++++++++ > xen/arch/x86/boot/mem.S | 2 ++ > xen/arch/x86/boot/trampoline.S | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > xen/arch/x86/boot/video.S | 30 +++++++++++++++------------- > xen/arch/x86/platform_hypercall.c | 18 ++++++++--------- > xen/arch/x86/setup.c | 22 ++++++++++----------- > xen/arch/x86/xen.lds.S | 9 ++++++++- > xen/include/asm-x86/edd.h | 1 - > 9 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/boot/edd.S b/xen/arch/x86/boot/edd.S > index 434bbbd960..138d04c964 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/edd.S > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/edd.S > @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ edd_done: > .Ledd_mbr_sig_skip: > ret > > + .pushsection .data.boot16, "aw", @progbits > GLOBAL(boot_edd_info_nr) > .byte 0 > GLOBAL(boot_mbr_signature_nr) > @@ -171,3 +172,4 @@ GLOBAL(boot_mbr_signature) > .fill EDD_MBR_SIG_MAX*8,1,0 > GLOBAL(boot_edd_info) > .fill EDD_INFO_MAX * (EDDEXTSIZE + EDDPARMSIZE), 1, 0 > + .popsection > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S b/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S > index 4118f73683..6d315020d2 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S > @@ -725,6 +725,17 @@ trampoline_setup: > cmp $sym_offs(__bootsym_seg_stop),%edi > jb 1b > > + /* Relocations for the boot data section. */ > + mov sym_fs(trampoline_phys),%edx > + add $(boot_trampoline_end - boot_trampoline_start),%edx > + mov $sym_offs(__bootdatasym_rel_start),%edi > +1: > + mov %fs:(%edi),%eax > + add %edx,%fs:(%edi,%eax) > + add $4,%edi > + cmp $sym_offs(__bootdatasym_rel_stop),%edi > + jb 1b > + > /* Do not parse command line on EFI platform here. */ > cmpb $0,sym_fs(efi_platform) > jnz 1f > @@ -762,6 +773,11 @@ trampoline_setup: > mov $((boot_trampoline_end - boot_trampoline_start) / 4),%ecx > rep movsl %fs:(%esi),%es:(%edi) > > + /* Copy boot data template to low memory. */ > + mov $sym_offs(bootdata_start),%esi > + mov $((bootdata_end - bootdata_start) / 4),%ecx > + rep movsl %fs:(%esi),%es:(%edi) Afaict neither bootdata_start nor bootdata_end are aligned, and so the difference isn't necessarily a multiple of 4. In fact the other (preexisting) movsl looks to have the same issue; I wonder if we propagate bad EDID data for that reason on certain builds / in certain versions. > --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/trampoline.S > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/trampoline.S > @@ -47,11 +47,15 @@ > .long 111b - (off) - .; \ > .popsection > > -#define bootdatasym(s) ((s)-boot_trampoline_start) > + .pushsection .data.boot16, "aw", @progbits > +GLOBAL(bootdata_start) > + .popsection > + > +#define bootdatasym(s) > ((s)-bootdata_start+(boot_trampoline_end-boot_trampoline_start)) Please can you add the missing blanks around the binary operators here? (I should perhaps asked this already on the earlier patch adding this #define.) Also it looks like the line might be overly long. > --- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/video.S > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/video.S > @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ > > #include "video.h" > > -/* Scratch space layout: boot_trampoline_end to boot_trampoline_end+0x1000. > */ > -#define modelist bootsym(boot_trampoline_end) /* 2kB (256 entries) */ > -#define vesa_glob_info (modelist + 0x800) /* 1kB */ > -#define vesa_mode_info (vesa_glob_info + 0x400) /* 1kB */ > +/* Scratch space layout: bootdata_end to bootdata_end+0x1000. */ > +#define modelist(t) bootdatasym_rel(bootdata_end,2,t) /* 2KiB > (256 entries) */ > +#define vesa_glob_info(t) bootdatasym_rel((bootdata_end+0x800),2,t) /* 1KiB > */ > +#define vesa_mode_info(t) bootdatasym_rel((bootdata_end+0xc00),2,t) /* 1KiB > */ Didn't you agree to extend the comment to warn about the risk resulting from the literal 2-s in here? > @@ -290,6 +292,11 @@ SECTIONS > DECL_SECTION(.data) { > *(.data.page_aligned) > *(.data) > + . = ALIGN(4); > + __bootdata_start = .; > + *(.data.boot16) > + . = ALIGN(4); > + __bootdata_end = .; What do you need the labels for here? And once they're gone the ALIGN() won't belong here anymore either - suitable alignment should be enforced by the contributions to the section. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |