[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 2/8] xen/arm: make process_memory_node a device_tree_node_func
On 8/17/19 1:48 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: On Fri, 16 Aug 2019, Julien Grall wrote: I think you are right, and honestly I was thinking about it while I updated this patch. If I use -EINVAL, it would be the same return error as the "invalid #address-cells or #size-cells". I just wanted to double-check that it is OK for you. We don't need to differentiate "invalid #{address, size}-cells" from "zero size", so using the same errno is fine. Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |