|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/AMD: make C-state handling independent of Dom0
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 01:01:48PM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> At least for more recent CPUs, following what BKDG / PPR suggest for the
> BIOS to surface via ACPI we can make ourselves independent of Dom0
> uploading respective data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2: Handle Hygon Fam18. Set local_apic_timer_c2_ok (for Fam17 and Hygon
> Fam18 only for now).
> ---
> TBD: We may want to verify that HLT indeed is configured to enter CC6.
> TBD: Brian's series specifies .target_residency as 1000 for CC6; may
> want to do so here as well. Question then is whether this value is
> also suitable for the older families.
> TBD: I guess we could extend this to families older then Fam15 as well.
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ boolean_param("lapic_timer_c2_ok", local
>
> struct acpi_processor_power *__read_mostly processor_powers[NR_CPUS];
>
> +static int8_t __read_mostly vendor_override;
AFAICT from the code below this is a tri-state (-1, 0, 1). Could it
maybe be turned into an enum with definitions of the different
states?
I think it would make the usage clearer.
> +
> struct hw_residencies
> {
> uint64_t mc0;
> @@ -1214,6 +1216,9 @@ long set_cx_pminfo(uint32_t acpi_id, str
> if ( pm_idle_save && pm_idle != acpi_processor_idle )
> return 0;
>
> + if ( vendor_override > 0 )
> + return 0;
> +
> print_cx_pminfo(acpi_id, power);
>
> cpu_id = get_cpu_id(acpi_id);
> @@ -1286,6 +1291,103 @@ long set_cx_pminfo(uint32_t acpi_id, str
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void amd_cpuidle_init(struct acpi_processor_power *power)
> +{
> + unsigned int i, nr = 0;
> + const struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = ¤t_cpu_data;
> + const unsigned int ecx_req = CPUID5_ECX_EXTENSIONS_SUPPORTED |
> + CPUID5_ECX_INTERRUPT_BREAK;
> + const struct acpi_processor_cx *cx = NULL;
> + static const struct acpi_processor_cx fam17[] = {
> + {
> + .type = ACPI_STATE_C1,
> + .entry_method = ACPI_CSTATE_EM_FFH,
> + .address = 0,
address field will already get set to 0 by default.
> + .latency = 1,
> + },
> + {
> + .type = ACPI_STATE_C2,
> + .entry_method = ACPI_CSTATE_EM_HALT,
> + .latency = 400,
Maybe the latency values could be added to cpuidle.h as defines?
> + },
> + };
> +
> + if ( pm_idle_save && pm_idle != acpi_processor_idle )
> + return;
> +
> + if ( vendor_override < 0 )
> + return;
> +
> + switch ( c->x86 )
> + {
> + case 0x18:
> + if ( boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_HYGON )
> + {
> + default:
> + vendor_override = -1;
> + return;
> + }
> + /* fall through */
> + case 0x17:
> + if ( cpu_has_monitor && c->cpuid_level >= CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF &&
> + (cpuid_ecx(CPUID_MWAIT_LEAF) & ecx_req) == ecx_req )
> + {
> + cx = fam17;
> + nr = ARRAY_SIZE(fam17);
> + local_apic_timer_c2_ok = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + /* fall through */
> + case 0x15:
> + case 0x16:
> + cx = &fam17[1];
> + nr = ARRAY_SIZE(fam17) - 1;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + power->flags.has_cst = true;
> +
> + for ( i = 0; i < nr; ++i )
> + {
> + if ( cx[i].type > max_cstate )
> + break;
> + power->states[i + 1] = cx[i];
> + power->states[i + 1].idx = i + 1;
> + power->states[i + 1].target_residency = cx[i].latency *
> latency_factor;
You could set target_residency as part of the initialization, but I
guess latency_factor being non-const that would move fam17 outside of
.rodata?
Thanks, Roger.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |