[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] xen/arm: handle reserved-memory in consider_modules and dt_unreserved_regions
reserved-memory regions overlap with memory nodes. The overlapping memory is reserved-memory and should be handled accordingly: consider_modules and dt_unreserved_regions should skip these regions the same way they are already skipping mem-reserve regions. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Changes in v3: - coding style - in-code comments Changes in v2: - fix commit message: full overlap - remove check_reserved_memory - extend consider_modules and dt_unreserved_regions --- xen/arch/arm/setup.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c index 215746a5c3..d9cfb1aa2f 100644 --- a/xen/arch/arm/setup.c +++ b/xen/arch/arm/setup.c @@ -206,6 +206,28 @@ void __init dt_unreserved_regions(paddr_t s, paddr_t e, } } + /* + * i is the current bootmodule we are evaluating across all possible + * kinds. + * + * When retrieving the corresponding reserved-memory addresses + * below, we need to index the bootinfo.reserved_mem bank starting + * from 0, and only counting the reserved-memory modules. Hence, + * we need to use i - nr. + */ + for ( ; i - nr < bootinfo.reserved_mem.nr_banks; i++ ) + { + paddr_t r_s = bootinfo.reserved_mem.bank[i - nr].start; + paddr_t r_e = r_s + bootinfo.reserved_mem.bank[i - nr].size; + + if ( s < r_e && r_s < e ) + { + dt_unreserved_regions(r_e, e, cb, i+1); + dt_unreserved_regions(s, r_s, cb, i+1); + return; + } + } + cb(s, e); } @@ -392,7 +414,7 @@ static paddr_t __init consider_modules(paddr_t s, paddr_t e, { const struct bootmodules *mi = &bootinfo.modules; int i; - int nr_rsvd; + int nr; s = (s+align-1) & ~(align-1); e = e & ~(align-1); @@ -418,9 +440,9 @@ static paddr_t __init consider_modules(paddr_t s, paddr_t e, /* Now check any fdt reserved areas. */ - nr_rsvd = fdt_num_mem_rsv(device_tree_flattened); + nr = fdt_num_mem_rsv(device_tree_flattened); - for ( ; i < mi->nr_mods + nr_rsvd; i++ ) + for ( ; i < mi->nr_mods + nr; i++ ) { paddr_t mod_s, mod_e; @@ -442,6 +464,31 @@ static paddr_t __init consider_modules(paddr_t s, paddr_t e, return consider_modules(s, mod_s, size, align, i+1); } } + + /* + * i is the current bootmodule we are evaluating, across all + * possible kinds of bootmodules. + * + * When retrieving the corresponding reserved-memory addresses, we + * need to index the bootinfo.reserved_mem bank starting from 0, and + * only counting the reserved-memory modules. Hence, we need to use + * i - nr. + */ + nr += mi->nr_mods; + for ( ; i - nr < bootinfo.reserved_mem.nr_banks; i++ ) + { + paddr_t r_s = bootinfo.reserved_mem.bank[i - nr].start; + paddr_t r_e = r_s + bootinfo.reserved_mem.bank[i - nr].size; + + if ( s < r_e && r_s < e ) + { + r_e = consider_modules(r_e, e, size, align, i + 1); + if ( r_e ) + return r_e; + + return consider_modules(s, r_s, size, align, i + 1); + } + } return e; } #endif -- 2.17.1 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |