[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/clear_page: Update clear_page_sse2() after dropping 32bit Xen
>>> On 17.06.19 at 21:49, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > This code was never updated when the 32bit build of Xen was dropped. > > * Expand the now-redundant ptr_reg macro. > * The number of iterations in the loop can be halfed by using 64bit writes, > without consuming any extra execution resource in the pipeline. Adjust all > numbers/offsets appropriately. > * Replace dec with sub to avoid a eflags stall, and position it to be > macro-fused with the related jmp. > * With no need to preserve eflags across the body of the loop, replace lea > with add which has 1/3'rd the latency on basically all 64bit hardware. > > A quick userspace perf test on my Haswell dev box indicates that the old > version takes ~1385 cycles on average (ignoring outliers), and the new version > takes ~1060 cyles, or about 77% of the time. > > Reported-by: Edwin Török <edvin.torok@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> Assuming you want this to go in despite your REP STOSQ remark later on, Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> with one remark: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/clear_page.S > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/clear_page.S > @@ -2,18 +2,16 @@ > > #include <asm/page.h> > > -#define ptr_reg %rdi > - > ENTRY(clear_page_sse2) > - mov $PAGE_SIZE/16, %ecx > + mov $PAGE_SIZE/32, %ecx > xor %eax,%eax > > -0: dec %ecx > - movnti %eax, (ptr_reg) > - movnti %eax, 4(ptr_reg) > - movnti %eax, 8(ptr_reg) > - movnti %eax, 12(ptr_reg) > - lea 16(ptr_reg), ptr_reg > +0: movnti %rax, 0(%rdi) Could I talk you into leaving out this 0? Rather old gas actually emits an 8-bit displacement when it's spelled like this. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |