Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.10-testing test] 137854: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 18.06.19 at 07:56, <osstest-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 137854 xen-4.10-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/137854/ 
> 
> Regressions :-(
> 
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
>  test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install 
> fail REGR. vs. 137381
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-stubdom-debianhvm-amd64-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install 
> fail REGR. vs. 137381

This (also seen on 4.11, but not on 4.12) looks to recur. For a -xsm
test I certainly find it odd to see

(XEN) Initialising XSM SILO mode

in the boot log - I'd expect Flask to be used by these tests. And
indeed the SILO backports look to be flawed / incomplete: While
the Kconfig change should have applied with fuzz only (thus
making the issue apparent), the remaining changes aren't taking
into account that the Kconfig option is FLASK there, not XSM_FLASK.
I'll see about producing a fixup patch; I don't think I want to
pull in the master/4.12 patch doing the rename.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel