[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 13/13] print: introduce a format specifier for pci_sbdf_t
>>> On 07.06.19 at 11:22, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The new format specifier is '%pp', and prints a pci_sbdf_t using the > seg:bus:dev.func format. Replace all SBDFs printed using > '%04x:%02x:%02x.%u' to use the new format specifier. Well, I continue to not be happy about the use of %p (rather than the proposed %o) here. I don't suppose you've actually tried, and it didn't work out? > --- a/xen/common/vsprintf.c > +++ b/xen/common/vsprintf.c > @@ -394,6 +394,20 @@ static char *print_vcpu(char *str, const char *end, > const struct vcpu *v) > return number(str + 1, end, v->vcpu_id, 10, -1, -1, 0); > } > > +static char *print_pci_addr(char *str, const char *end, const pci_sbdf_t > *sbdf) > +{ > + str = number(str, end, sbdf->seg, 16, 4, -1, ZEROPAD); > + if ( str < end ) > + *str = ':'; > + str = number(str + 1, end, sbdf->bus, 16, 2, -1, ZEROPAD); > + if ( str < end ) > + *str = ':'; > + str = number(str + 1, end, sbdf->dev, 16, 2, -1, ZEROPAD); > + if ( str < end ) > + *str = '.'; > + return number(str + 1, end, sbdf->fn, 8, -1, -1, 0); Nit: Blank line above here please. > +} > + > static char *pointer(char *str, const char *end, const char **fmt_ptr, > const void *arg, int field_width, int precision, > int flags) > @@ -476,6 +490,10 @@ static char *pointer(char *str, const char *end, const > char **fmt_ptr, > } > } > > + case 'p': /* PCI SBDF. */ Another nit: The full stop would imo better be omitted here. I notice this is inconsistent at present in this function, but generally I think it's better to not have it when a comment is not really a sentence. The style guidelines explicitly permit omitting it iirc. > + ++*fmt_ptr; > + return print_pci_addr(str, end, arg); > + > case 's': /* Symbol name with offset and size (iff offset != 0) */ > case 'S': /* Symbol name unconditionally with offset and size */ > { In principle I'd expect this to not even build on Arm, as pci_sbdf_t should not be defined. I guess you did build test it and it worked, but I think the additions should still go in #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PCI. Also I'd like to point out that again review and in particular collection of acks might be easier if this got split up a little. But I'm not going to insist. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |