Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 136566: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [xen-4.8-testing test] 136566: regressions - FAIL"):
> Am I mistaken in understanding that these two will go away only once
> the 4.7 tree gets a push (which, even when its own build failures have
> got addressed, will require a 4.6 push to occur first), and in turn the
> respective 4.9 failures will go away only once we get a push here?

Yes.

>  If so - what's the state of these old trees? So far I had been
> under the impression that necessary build fix backports had been
> identified and applied ...

Yes.

However,

4.6 is quite badly broken.  See my mail

  Subject: Re: [xen-4.6-testing test] 137064: regressions - FAIL
  Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 11:33:31 +0100

in which I proposed a force push despite these serious problems.
I'll check with you on irc now whether you agree that this should be
pushed now.

4.7 is broken with HVM guests.  You wrote about this today:

  Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 137065: regressions - FAIL
  Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 08:04:00 +0100

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel