Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.11-testing test] 136184: regressions - FAIL

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Stefano,

On 06/06/2019 23:21, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> > On 06/06/2019 09:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > On 05.06.19 at 23:38, <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On 6/5/19 9:29 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > My vote is to backport to both. Jan/others please express your opinion.
> > > > To follow the vote convention:
> > > >
> > > > 4.11: -1
> > > Hmm, I'm surprised by this. Didn't I see you mention to Ian (on irc)
> > > you'd prefer backporting over working around this in osstest?
> > My mistake here. It should be +1 here.
> >
> > > > 4.10: -1 (I was tempted by a -2 but if the other feels it should be
> > > > backported then I will not push back).
> > > Considering the situation, I'm leaning towards Julien's opinion here.
> > > But take this with care - I have way too little insight to have a
> > > meaningful opinion.
> All right. I backported the patch to staging-4.11 only.
Thank you! I will watch the next osstest flight for qemu-upstream-4.11 and see 
if it boots.
Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel