Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 14/14] xen/mm: Provide dummy M2P-related helpers when !CONFIG_HAVE_M2P

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 03.06.19 at 18:03, <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> At the moment, Arm is providing a dummy implementation for the M2P
> helpers used in common code. However, they are quite isolated and could
> be used by other architecture in the future. So move all the helpers in
> xen/mm.h.

And where's the problem then adding ...

> --- a/xen/include/xen/mm.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/mm.h
> @@ -655,4 +655,18 @@ static inline void share_xen_page_with_privileged_guests(
>      share_xen_page_with_guest(page, dom_xen, flags);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Dummy implementation of M2P-related helpers for common code when
> + * the architecture doesn't have an M2P.
> + */
> +#ifndef CONFIG_HAS_M2P
> +
> +#define INVALID_M2P_ENTRY        (~0UL)
> +#define SHARED_M2P_ENTRY         (~0UL - 1UL)
> +#define SHARED_M2P(_e)           ((_e) == SHARED_M2P_ENTRY)
> +
> +static inline void set_pfn_from_mfn(mfn_t mfn, unsigned long pfn) {}
> +
> +#endif

... mfn_to_gmfn() to this set? Perhaps a declaration without any
definition anywhere?

Also please take the opportunity and drop the unnecessary underscore
from _e. And actually, shouldn't this uniformly return false? At which
point you don't even need SHARED_M2P_ENTRY.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel