|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.11-testing test] 136184: regressions - FAIL
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.11-testing test]
136184: regressions - FAIL"):
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Per the discussion before, the .config is different between the 2 flights.
> > QEMU testing is not selecting CONFIG_LIVEPATCH while staging-4.11 is.
>
> Has anybody tried to start selecting CONFIG_LIVEPATCH in the QEMU testing
> branch? Is it possible to give it a try?
I can do this we thinks it's desirable. But I think it is probably
actually helpful to test both, just in case non-LIVEPATCH breaks. As
it just have.
AIUI this is thought to be quite a rare problem, so it showing up in a
qemu branch is OK.
Otherwise maybe we would have to add both with- and without-LIVEPATCH
tests to the xen-* flights. We already have both with- and
without-XSM, and this would add another dimension to the build matrix.
And we would have to decide what subset of the tests should be run in
each configuration.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |