[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.11-testing test] 136184: regressions - FAIL
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-4.11-testing test] 136184: regressions - FAIL"): > On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > > Per the discussion before, the .config is different between the 2 flights. > > QEMU testing is not selecting CONFIG_LIVEPATCH while staging-4.11 is. > > Has anybody tried to start selecting CONFIG_LIVEPATCH in the QEMU testing > branch? Is it possible to give it a try? I can do this we thinks it's desirable. But I think it is probably actually helpful to test both, just in case non-LIVEPATCH breaks. As it just have. AIUI this is thought to be quite a rare problem, so it showing up in a qemu branch is OK. Otherwise maybe we would have to add both with- and without-LIVEPATCH tests to the xen-* flights. We already have both with- and without-XSM, and this would add another dimension to the build matrix. And we would have to decide what subset of the tests should be run in each configuration. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |