|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/3] x86/mm: Introduce altp2m_get_gfn_type_access
On 09.04.2019 17:37, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:03 AM Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
> <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 09.04.2019 16:48, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:04 AM Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
>>> <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This patch moves common code from p2m_set_altp2m_mem_access() and
>>>> p2m_change_altp2m_gfn() into one function
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes since V2:
>>>> - Change var name from found_in_hostp2m to copied_from_hostp2m
>>>> - Move the type check from altp2m_get_gfn_type_access() to the
>>>> callers.
>>>> ---
>>>> xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c | 32 ++++++++++++----------------
>>>> xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 41 ++++++++++++++----------------------
>>>> xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c
>>>> index 56c06a4fc6..bf67ddb15a 100644
>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c
>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/mem_access.c
>>>> @@ -265,31 +265,27 @@ int p2m_set_altp2m_mem_access(struct domain *d,
>>>> struct p2m_domain *hp2m,
>>>> unsigned int page_order;
>>>> unsigned long gfn_l = gfn_x(gfn);
>>>> int rc;
>>>> + bool copied_from_hostp2m;
>>>>
>>>> - mfn = ap2m->get_entry(ap2m, gfn, &t, &old_a, 0, NULL, NULL);
>>>> + mfn = altp2m_get_gfn_type_access(ap2m, gfn, &t, &old_a, &page_order,
>>>> &copied_from_hostp2m);
>>>>
>>>> - /* Check host p2m if no valid entry in alternate */
>>>> if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) )
>>>> + return -ESRCH;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* If this is a superpage, copy that first */
>>>> + if ( page_order != PAGE_ORDER_4K && copied_from_hostp2m )
>>>> {
>>>> + unsigned long mask = ~((1UL << page_order) - 1);
>>>> + gfn_t gfn2 = _gfn(gfn_l & mask);
>>>> + mfn_t mfn2 = _mfn(mfn_x(mfn) & mask);
>>>>
>>>> - mfn = __get_gfn_type_access(hp2m, gfn_l, &t, &old_a,
>>>> - P2M_ALLOC | P2M_UNSHARE, &page_order,
>>>> 0);
>>>> + /* Note: currently it is not safe to remap to a shared entry */
>>>> + if ( t != p2m_ram_rw )
>>>> + return -ESRCH;
>>>>
>>>> - rc = -ESRCH;
>>>> - if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) || t != p2m_ram_rw )
>>>> + rc = ap2m->set_entry(ap2m, gfn2, mfn2, page_order, t, old_a, 1);
>>>> + if ( rc )
>>>> return rc;
>>>> -
>>>> - /* If this is a superpage, copy that first */
>>>> - if ( page_order != PAGE_ORDER_4K )
>>>> - {
>>>> - unsigned long mask = ~((1UL << page_order) - 1);
>>>> - gfn_t gfn2 = _gfn(gfn_l & mask);
>>>> - mfn_t mfn2 = _mfn(mfn_x(mfn) & mask);
>>>> -
>>>> - rc = ap2m->set_entry(ap2m, gfn2, mfn2, page_order, t, old_a,
>>>> 1);
>>>> - if ( rc )
>>>> - return rc;
>>>> - }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /*
>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
>>>> index b9bbb8f485..d38d7c29ca 100644
>>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
>>>> @@ -2626,6 +2626,7 @@ int p2m_change_altp2m_gfn(struct domain *d, unsigned
>>>> int idx,
>>>> mfn_t mfn;
>>>> unsigned int page_order;
>>>> int rc = -EINVAL;
>>>> + bool copied_from_hostp2m;
>>>>
>>>> if ( idx >= MAX_ALTP2M || d->arch.altp2m_eptp[idx] ==
>>>> mfn_x(INVALID_MFN) )
>>>> return rc;
>>>> @@ -2636,7 +2637,7 @@ int p2m_change_altp2m_gfn(struct domain *d, unsigned
>>>> int idx,
>>>> p2m_lock(hp2m);
>>>> p2m_lock(ap2m);
>>>>
>>>> - mfn = ap2m->get_entry(ap2m, old_gfn, &t, &a, 0, NULL, NULL);
>>>> + mfn = altp2m_get_gfn_type_access(ap2m, old_gfn, &t, &a, &page_order,
>>>> &copied_from_hostp2m);
>>>>
>>>> if ( gfn_eq(new_gfn, INVALID_GFN) )
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -2646,37 +2647,27 @@ int p2m_change_altp2m_gfn(struct domain *d,
>>>> unsigned int idx,
>>>> goto out;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - /* Check host p2m if no valid entry in alternate */
>>>> - if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) )
>>>> - {
>>>> - mfn = __get_gfn_type_access(hp2m, gfn_x(old_gfn), &t, &a,
>>>> - P2M_ALLOC, &page_order, 0);
>>>> + if ( !mfn_valid(mfn) || (t != p2m_ram_rw && copied_from_hostp2m) )
>>>
>>> Is this check correct? Why do you want to get out only when type is
>>> non-rw *and* it's copied from the hostp2m? You could have non-rw
>>> entries like mmio in the altp2m that were lazily copied and I don't
>>> think we want to allow remapping to those either.
>>
>> I just copied the functionality. If this is needed I will add a || t !=
>> p2m_mmio_dm and p2m_mmio_direct.
>
> My problem is with the && copied_form_hostp2m part. Why is that a criteria?
The (t != p2m_ram_rw) check was done only for the get from hostp2m.
If you think that I should do the check for all mfns (hostp2 and altp2m)
then I can drop the copied_from_hostp2m bool and add mmio check.
I hope I understand the problem correctly.
Alex
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |