Re: [Xen-devel] Enhancing Xen's Kconfig infrastructure to support tailored solutions

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 14.02.19 at 19:32, <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Do you have any other suggestions about things that could be removed to
> reach down to 100K LOC, in addition to what you have already written
> above (Intel/AMD, shadow)?

If you mean ones we already have Kconfig options for, then you
could drop TBOOT, which in turn drops CRYPTO, which together
is about 3k LOC. Turning off XENOPROF would yield another 2k.
I assume you've already restricted yourself to just the null
scheduler? But that's about it, I think, without actual code (or at
least Kconfig) changes.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel