Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] x86/emulate: Move hvmemul_linear_to_phys

[Razvan Cojocaru <rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/4/19 1:55 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alexandru Stefan ISAILA [mailto:aisaila@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 04 February 2019 11:37
> > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>; jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; Andrew
> > Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>; Roger
> > Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>; rcojocaru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > tamas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] x86/emulate: Move hvmemul_linear_to_phys
> >
> > Ping, any thoughts on this are appreciated.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alex
> >
> > On 11.01.2019 17:37, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote:
> > > This is done so hvmemul_linear_to_phys() can be called from
> > > hvmemul_map_linear_addr()
> I have no objection to pure code movement for this purpose. I certainly prefer 
> it to forward declaration of statics.
Thanks for the reply!

We're also after thoughts on the whole series (replying to this specific 
patch instead of the cover letter was an accident).
We expect the second patch to be more controversial and in some need of 
detailed scrutiny.

Thanks,
Razvan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel