[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC for-4.12] x86: put CONFIG_{HVM, PV} under EXPERT
Enabling and disabling one of the two isn't tested in OSSTest yet. Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> --- We need to sort this out for 4.12 release. On the one hand, exposing them seems risky. On the other hand, if there are bugs which cause xen to wander into a path which hits BUG or ASSERT, they are problems with older releases as well. And we definitely want to make each of the two security supported in the long run. --- xen/arch/x86/Kconfig | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig index 5c2d1070b6..3e020dc629 100644 --- a/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ source "arch/Kconfig" config PV def_bool y - prompt "PV support" + prompt "PV support" if EXPERT = "y" + default y ---help--- Interfaces to support PV domains. These require guest kernel support to run as a PV guest, but don't require any specific hardware support. @@ -68,7 +69,7 @@ config PV_LINEAR_PT config HVM def_bool !PV_SHIM_EXCLUSIVE - prompt "HVM support" + prompt "HVM support" if EXPERT = "y" ---help--- Interfaces to support HVM domains. HVM domains require hardware virtualisation extensions (e.g. Intel VT-x, AMD SVM), but can boot -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |