[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v11] tolerate jitter in cpu_khz calculation to avoid TSC emulation



Am Thu, 13 Dec 2018 01:45:39 -0700
schrieb "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>:

> >>> On 13.12.18 at 09:18, <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:  
> > Am Wed, 12 Dec 2018 09:39:25 -0700
> > schrieb "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>:
> >   
> >> >>> On 12.12.18 at 16:20, <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:    
> >> > If a domU uses TSC as clocksoure it also must run NTP in some way to
> >> > avoid the potential drift what will most likely happen, independent of
> >> > any migration.    
> >> Which drift? While anyone's well advised to run NTP, a completely
> >> isolated set of systems may have no need to, if their interactions don't
> >> depend on exactly matching time.  
> > 
> > If these hosts do not sync time to some reference host, the advancing of 
> > time
> > is undefined before and after my change.  
> 
> I'm lost. I simply don't understand what you're trying to tell me,
> or how your answer relates to my question.

Then please rephrase the question? I do not see how my path affects the
advancing of time in domUs running on isolated systems. If their hardware
clocks advance at the same speed, my patch will not affect it. And if they
do advance at a different speed, what can emulation do to help with 
"correctness"?

Olaf

Attachment: pgpDtw0Frw_xh.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.