[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] libx86: Work around GCC bug with ebx output constrants

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Versions of GCC before 5 can't compile cpuid.c, and fail with the rather 
cryptic:

  In file included from lib/x86/cpuid.c:3:0:
  lib/x86/cpuid.c: In function ‘x86_cpuid_policy_fill_native’:
  include/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.h:25:5: error: inconsistent operand constraints in 
an ‘asm’
       asm ( "cpuid"
       ^

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
CC: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>

v2:
 * GCC 5 is fine.  Its cpuid instrinct has none of the PIC workarounds thant 
4.9 have.
 * Fix 64bit builds with larger models.
---
 xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.h | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.h b/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.h
index 266c910..cc30654 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/lib/x86/cpuid.h
@@ -20,21 +20,50 @@ struct cpuid_leaf
     uint32_t a, b, c, d;
 };
 
+/*
+ * Versions of GCC before 5 are unable to cope with %rBX output constraints
+ * when compiling Position Independent Code, and produce a rather cryptic
+ * error:
+ *    error: inconsistent operand constraints in an ‘asm’
+ *
+ * To work around the issue, use a separate register to hold the the %rBX
+ * output, and xchg twice to leave %rBX preserved around the asm() statement.
+ */
+#if defined(__PIC__) && __GNUC__ < 5 && !defined(__clang__) && 
defined(__i386__)
+# define XCHG_BX "xchg %%ebx, %[bx];"
+# define BX_CON [bx] "=&r"
+#elif defined(__PIC__) && __GNUC__ < 5 && !defined(__clang__) && \
+    defined(__x86_64__) && (defined(__code_model_medium__) || \
+                            defined(__code_model_large__))
+# define XCHG_BX "xchg %%rbx, %q[bx];"
+# define BX_CON [bx] "=&r"
+#else
+# define XCHG_BX ""
+# define BX_CON "=&b"
+#endif
+
 static inline void cpuid_leaf(uint32_t leaf, struct cpuid_leaf *l)
 {
-    asm ( "cpuid"
-          : "=a" (l->a), "=b" (l->b), "=c" (l->c), "=d" (l->d)
+    asm ( XCHG_BX
+          "cpuid;"
+          XCHG_BX
+          : "=a" (l->a), BX_CON (l->b), "=&c" (l->c), "=&d" (l->d)
           : "a" (leaf) );
 }
 
 static inline void cpuid_count_leaf(
     uint32_t leaf, uint32_t subleaf, struct cpuid_leaf *l)
 {
-    asm ( "cpuid"
-          : "=a" (l->a), "=b" (l->b), "=c" (l->c), "=d" (l->d)
+    asm ( XCHG_BX
+          "cpuid;"
+          XCHG_BX
+          : "=a" (l->a), BX_CON (l->b), "=c" (l->c), "=&d" (l->d)
           : "a" (leaf), "c" (subleaf) );
 }
 
+#undef BX_CON
+#undef XCHG
+
 #define CPUID_GUEST_NR_BASIC      (0xdu + 1)
 #define CPUID_GUEST_NR_FEAT       (0u + 1)
 #define CPUID_GUEST_NR_CACHE      (5u + 1)
-- 
2.1.4


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel