[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: fix xen_qlock_wait()


  • To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:20:29 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jgross@xxxxxxxx; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsBNBFOMcBYBCACgGjqjoGvbEouQZw/ToiBg9W98AlM2QHV+iNHsEs7kxWhKMjrioyspZKOB ycWxw3ie3j9uvg9EOB3aN4xiTv4qbnGiTr3oJhkB1gsb6ToJQZ8uxGq2kaV2KL9650I1SJve dYm8Of8Zd621lSmoKOwlNClALZNew72NjJLEzTalU1OdT7/i1TXkH09XSSI8mEQ/ouNcMvIJ NwQpd369y9bfIhWUiVXEK7MlRgUG6MvIj6Y3Am/BBLUVbDa4+gmzDC9ezlZkTZG2t14zWPvx XP3FAp2pkW0xqG7/377qptDmrk42GlSKN4z76ELnLxussxc7I2hx18NUcbP8+uty4bMxABEB AAHNHkp1ZXJnZW4gR3Jvc3MgPGpncm9zc0BzdXNlLmRlPsLAeQQTAQIAIwUCU4xw6wIbAwcL CQgHAwIBBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJELDendYovxMvi4UH/Ri+OXlObzqMANruTd4N zmVBAZgx1VW6jLc8JZjQuJPSsd/a+bNr3BZeLV6lu4Pf1Yl2Log129EX1KWYiFFvPbIiq5M5 kOXTO8Eas4CaScCvAZ9jCMQCgK3pFqYgirwTgfwnPtxFxO/F3ZcS8jovza5khkSKL9JGq8Nk czDTruQ/oy0WUHdUr9uwEfiD9yPFOGqp4S6cISuzBMvaAiC5YGdUGXuPZKXLpnGSjkZswUzY d9BVSitRL5ldsQCg6GhDoEAeIhUC4SQnT9SOWkoDOSFRXZ+7+WIBGLiWMd+yKDdRG5RyP/8f 3tgGiB6cyuYfPDRGsELGjUaTUq3H2xZgIPfOwE0EU4xwFgEIAMsx+gDjgzAY4H1hPVXgoLK8 B93sTQFN9oC6tsb46VpxyLPfJ3T1A6Z6MVkLoCejKTJ3K9MUsBZhxIJ0hIyvzwI6aYJsnOew cCiCN7FeKJ/oA1RSUemPGUcIJwQuZlTOiY0OcQ5PFkV5YxMUX1F/aTYXROXgTmSaw0aC1Jpo w7Ss1mg4SIP/tR88/d1+HwkJDVW1RSxC1PWzGizwRv8eauImGdpNnseneO2BNWRXTJumAWDD pYxpGSsGHXuZXTPZqOOZpsHtInFyi5KRHSFyk2Xigzvh3b9WqhbgHHHE4PUVw0I5sIQt8hJq 5nH5dPqz4ITtCL9zjiJsExHuHKN3NZsAEQEAAcLAXwQYAQIACQUCU4xwFgIbDAAKCRCw3p3W KL8TL0P4B/9YWver5uD/y/m0KScK2f3Z3mXJhME23vGBbMNlfwbr+meDMrJZ950CuWWnQ+d+ Ahe0w1X7e3wuLVODzjcReQ/v7b4JD3wwHxe+88tgB9byc0NXzlPJWBaWV01yB2/uefVKryAf AHYEd0gCRhx7eESgNBe3+YqWAQawunMlycsqKa09dBDL1PFRosF708ic9346GLHRc6Vj5SRA UTHnQqLetIOXZm3a2eQ1gpQK9MmruO86Vo93p39bS1mqnLLspVrL4rhoyhsOyh0Hd28QCzpJ wKeHTd0MAWAirmewHXWPco8p1Wg+V+5xfZzuQY0f4tQxvOpXpt4gQ1817GQ5/Ed/wsDtBBgB CAAgFiEEhRJncuj2BJSl0Jf3sN6d1ii/Ey8FAlrd8NACGwIAgQkQsN6d1ii/Ey92IAQZFggA HRYhBFMtsHpB9jjzHji4HoBcYbtP2GO+BQJa3fDQAAoJEIBcYbtP2GO+TYsA/30H/0V6cr/W V+J/FCayg6uNtm3MJLo4rE+o4sdpjjsGAQCooqffpgA+luTT13YZNV62hAnCLKXH9n3+ZAgJ RtAyDWk1B/0SMDVs1wxufMkKC3Q/1D3BYIvBlrTVKdBYXPxngcRoqV2J77lscEvkLNUGsu/z W2pf7+P3mWWlrPMJdlbax00vevyBeqtqNKjHstHatgMZ2W0CFC4hJ3YEetuRBURYPiGzuJXU pAd7a7BdsqWC4o+GTm5tnGrCyD+4gfDSpkOT53S/GNO07YkPkm/8J4OBoFfgSaCnQ1izwgJQ jIpcG2fPCI2/hxf2oqXPYbKr1v4Z1wthmoyUgGN0LPTIm+B5vdY82wI5qe9uN6UOGyTH2B3p hRQUWqCwu2sqkI3LLbTdrnyDZaixT2T0f4tyF5Lfs+Ha8xVMhIyzNb1byDI5FKCb
  • Cc: sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Nov 2018 15:20:48 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Openpgp: preference=signencrypt

On 09/11/2018 16:02, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 09/11/18 13:04, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Commit a856531951dc80 ("xen: make xen_qlock_wait() nestable")
>> introduced a regression for Xen guests running fully virtualized
>> (HVM or PVH mode). The Xen hypervisor wouldn't return from the poll
>> hypercall with interrupts disabled in case of an interrupt (for PV
>> guests it does).
>>
>> So instead of disabling interrupts in xen_qlock_wait() use a nesting
>> counter to avoid calling xen_clear_irq_pending() in case
>> xen_qlock_wait() is nested.
>>
>> Fixes: a856531951dc80 ("xen: make xen_qlock_wait() nestable")
>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> Although you don't seem too interested, you can stick on a:
> Tested-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> if you like.

I am interested.

OTOH I wanted to post the patch officially to give others the chance to
send remarks.


Juergen

> 
> --
> Sander
> 
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c | 14 ++++++++------
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
>> index 441c88262169..1c8a8816a402 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/log2.h>
>>  #include <linux/gfp.h>
>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
>>  
>>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
>>  #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
>> @@ -21,6 +22,7 @@
>>  
>>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, lock_kicker_irq) = -1;
>>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char *, irq_name);
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(atomic_t, xen_qlock_wait_nest);
>>  static bool xen_pvspin = true;
>>  
>>  static void xen_qlock_kick(int cpu)
>> @@ -39,25 +41,25 @@ static void xen_qlock_kick(int cpu)
>>   */
>>  static void xen_qlock_wait(u8 *byte, u8 val)
>>  {
>> -    unsigned long flags;
>>      int irq = __this_cpu_read(lock_kicker_irq);
>> +    atomic_t *nest_cnt = this_cpu_ptr(&xen_qlock_wait_nest);
>>  
>>      /* If kicker interrupts not initialized yet, just spin */
>>      if (irq == -1 || in_nmi())
>>              return;
>>  
>> -    /* Guard against reentry. */
>> -    local_irq_save(flags);
>> +    /* Detect reentry. */
>> +    atomic_inc(nest_cnt);
>>  
>> -    /* If irq pending already clear it. */
>> -    if (xen_test_irq_pending(irq)) {
>> +    /* If irq pending already and no nested call clear it. */
>> +    if (atomic_read(nest_cnt) == 1 && xen_test_irq_pending(irq)) {
>>              xen_clear_irq_pending(irq);
>>      } else if (READ_ONCE(*byte) == val) {
>>              /* Block until irq becomes pending (or a spurious wakeup) */
>>              xen_poll_irq(irq);
>>      }
>>  
>> -    local_irq_restore(flags);
>> +    atomic_dec(nest_cnt);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static irqreturn_t dummy_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>>
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.