Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3] devicetree, xen: add xen, shared-memory binding

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Ian,

On 02/11/2018 15:30, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH v3] devicetree,xen: add xen,shared-memory 
> binding"):
> > On 11/1/18 8:40 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > >   From the DT binding point of view, it would be fine. Conceptually it
> > > would also be fine. However, I doubt that the current libxl
> > > implementation would work with multiple mappings.
> > I can't see why it would not work. I think we designed the refcount for
> > this purpose.
> libxl doesn't see the actual mappings, does it ?  It just puts things
> into the p2m.
Yes. That's why I think multiple mappings is actually possible.

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel