Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/8] viridian: separate time related enlightenment implementations...

[Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Pau Monne
> Sent: 30 October 2018 17:03
> To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Andrew Cooper
> <Andrew.Cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>; Wei Liu <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jan Beulich
> <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 6/8] viridian: separate time related
> enlightenment implementations...
> 
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 06:02:09PM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > @@ -154,6 +145,14 @@ viridian_hypercall(struct cpu_user_regs *regs);
> >  void viridian_time_ref_count_freeze(struct domain *d);
> >  void viridian_time_ref_count_thaw(struct domain *d);
> >
> > +int viridian_time_wrmsr(struct vcpu *v, uint32_t idx, uint64_t val);
> > +int viridian_time_rdmsr(const struct vcpu *v, uint32_t idx, uint64_t
> *val);
> > +
> > +void viridian_time_save_domain_ctxt(
> > +    const struct domain *d, struct hvm_viridian_domain_context *ctxt);
> > +void viridian_time_load_domain_ctxt(
> > +    struct domain *d, struct hvm_viridian_domain_context *ctxt);
> 
> Can ctxt be constifyed in the load case?

I guess it could be, yes.

  Paul

> 
> Thanks, Roger.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel