[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] xen/keyhandler: Drop keyhandler_scratch
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 09:40:17AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 30.10.18 at 16:32, <wei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 09:21:03AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> >>> On 22.10.18 at 14:58, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c > >> > +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c > >> > @@ -487,6 +487,7 @@ static EFI_FILE_HANDLE __init > >> > get_parent_handle(EFI_LOADED_IMAGE *loaded_image, > >> > CHAR16 **leaf) > >> > { > >> > static EFI_GUID __initdata fs_protocol = > >> > SIMPLE_FILE_SYSTEM_PROTOCOL; > >> > + static CHAR16 __initdata buffer[256]; > >> > >> Did you intentionally halve the size of the buffer? > > > > > > Seeing the length field consists of two uint8, the maximum length of the > > path is 256. > > With > > #define DevicePathNodeLength(a) ( ((a)->Length[0]) | ((a)->Length[1] << > 8) ) > > I'd rather say 65536. Yes you're right. Can't do calculation when I'm having a cold. :-( But having 65536 is unrealistic. Wei. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |