[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] idle/x86: remove the call to boot_init_stack_canary() from cpu_startup_entry()
On 10/19/2018 03:31 AM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > commit d7880812b359 ("idle: Add the stack canary init to > cpu_startup_entry()") added the call to boot_init_stack_canary() > in cpu_startup_entry() in an #ifdef CONFIG_X86 statement, with > the intention to remove that #ifdef later. > > While implementing stack protector for powerpc, it has been > observed that calling boot_init_stack_canary() is also needed > for powerpc which uses per task (TLS) stack canary like the X86. > > However, calling boot_init_stack_canary() would break arches > using global stack canary (ARM, SH, MIPS and XTENSA). > > Instead of modifying the #ifdef CONFIG_X86 in an > #if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_PPC), powerpc > implemented the call to boot_init_stack_canary() in the function > calling cpu_startup_entry() > > On x86, we have two functions calling cpu_startup_entry(): > - start_secondary() > - cpu_bringup_and_idle() > > start_secondary() already calls boot_init_stack_canary(). > > This patch adds the call to boot_init_stack_canary() in > cpu_bringup_and_idle() and removes it from cpu_startup_entry() > > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx> > --- > v2: Revised commit log (#if defined had been droped by 'git commit') > > arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c | 1 + > kernel/sched/idle.c | 15 --------------- > 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c > index e3b18ad49889..0e05e8e23998 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp_pv.c > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ static void cpu_bringup(void) > asmlinkage __visible void cpu_bringup_and_idle(void) > { > cpu_bringup(); > + boot_init_stack_canary(); I think I saw from the kbuild test robot in your first pass that this is an implicit declaration. Quick look at my local git tree and I don't see an include for stackprotector.h in this file. -Tyrel > cpu_startup_entry(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_IDLE); > } > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c > index 16f84142f2f4..f5516bae0c1b 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c > @@ -347,21 +347,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(play_idle); > > void cpu_startup_entry(enum cpuhp_state state) > { > - /* > - * This #ifdef needs to die, but it's too late in the cycle to > - * make this generic (ARM and SH have never invoked the canary > - * init for the non boot CPUs!). Will be fixed in 3.11 > - */ > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86 > - /* > - * If we're the non-boot CPU, nothing set the stack canary up > - * for us. The boot CPU already has it initialized but no harm > - * in doing it again. This is a good place for updating it, as > - * we wont ever return from this function (so the invalid > - * canaries already on the stack wont ever trigger). > - */ > - boot_init_stack_canary(); > -#endif > arch_cpu_idle_prepare(); > cpuhp_online_idle(state); > while (1) > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |