[Xen-devel] [PATCH v1 1/6] x86/vvmx: introduce vvmcx_valid()

[Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx>]

As a convenient helper function and refactor the code to use it.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Sergey Dyasli <sergey.dyasli@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c         | 17 ++++++++---------
 xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/nestedhvm.h |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
index 0e45db83e5..8eee6d0ea8 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vvmx.c
@@ -521,8 +521,7 @@ static void vmfail(struct cpu_user_regs *regs, enum 
vmx_insn_errno errno)
     if ( errno == VMX_INSN_SUCCEED )
         return;
 
-    if ( vcpu_nestedhvm(current).nv_vvmcxaddr != INVALID_PADDR &&
-         errno != VMX_INSN_FAIL_INVALID )
+    if ( vvmcx_valid(current) && errno != VMX_INSN_FAIL_INVALID )
         vmfail_valid(regs, errno);
     else
         vmfail_invalid(regs);
@@ -805,7 +804,7 @@ static void nvmx_purge_vvmcs(struct vcpu *v)
     int i;
 
     __clear_current_vvmcs(v);
-    if ( nvcpu->nv_vvmcxaddr != INVALID_PADDR )
+    if ( vvmcx_valid(v) )
         hvm_unmap_guest_frame(nvcpu->nv_vvmcx, 1);
     nvcpu->nv_vvmcx = NULL;
     nvcpu->nv_vvmcxaddr = INVALID_PADDR;
@@ -1601,7 +1600,7 @@ static int nvmx_vmresume(struct vcpu *v, struct 
cpu_user_regs *regs)
     struct nestedvcpu *nvcpu = &vcpu_nestedhvm(v);
 
     /* check VMCS is valid and IO BITMAP is set */
-    if ( (nvcpu->nv_vvmcxaddr != INVALID_PADDR) &&
+    if ( vvmcx_valid(v) &&
             ((nvmx->iobitmap[0] && nvmx->iobitmap[1]) ||
             !(__n2_exec_control(v) & CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_IO_BITMAP) ) )
         nvcpu->nv_vmentry_pending = 1;
@@ -1622,7 +1621,7 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmresume(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
     if ( rc != X86EMUL_OKAY )
         return rc;
 
-    if ( vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcxaddr == INVALID_PADDR )
+    if ( !vvmcx_valid(v) )
     {
         vmfail_invalid(regs);
         return X86EMUL_OKAY;        
@@ -1656,7 +1655,7 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmlaunch(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
     if ( rc != X86EMUL_OKAY )
         return rc;
 
-    if ( vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcxaddr == INVALID_PADDR )
+    if ( !vvmcx_valid(v) )
     {
         vmfail_invalid(regs);
         return X86EMUL_OKAY;
@@ -1709,7 +1708,7 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmptrld(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
     if ( nvcpu->nv_vvmcxaddr != gpa )
         nvmx_purge_vvmcs(v);
 
-    if ( nvcpu->nv_vvmcxaddr == INVALID_PADDR )
+    if ( !vvmcx_valid(v) )
     {
         bool_t writable;
         void *vvmcx = hvm_map_guest_frame_rw(paddr_to_pfn(gpa), 1, &writable);
@@ -1848,7 +1847,7 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmread(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
     if ( rc != X86EMUL_OKAY )
         return rc;
 
-    if ( vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcxaddr == INVALID_PADDR )
+    if ( !vvmcx_valid(v) )
     {
         vmfail_invalid(regs);
         return X86EMUL_OKAY;
@@ -1891,7 +1890,7 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmwrite(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
              != X86EMUL_OKAY )
         return X86EMUL_EXCEPTION;
 
-    if ( vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcxaddr == INVALID_PADDR )
+    if ( !vvmcx_valid(v) )
     {
         vmfail_invalid(regs);
         return X86EMUL_OKAY;
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/nestedhvm.h 
b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/nestedhvm.h
index 9d1c2742b5..e09fa9d47d 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/nestedhvm.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/hvm/nestedhvm.h
@@ -92,4 +92,9 @@ static inline void nestedhvm_set_cr(struct vcpu *v, unsigned 
int cr,
         v->arch.hvm.nvcpu.guest_cr[cr] = value;
 }
 
+static inline bool vvmcx_valid(const struct vcpu *v)
+{
+    return vcpu_nestedhvm(v).nv_vvmcxaddr != INVALID_PADDR;
+}
+
 #endif /* _HVM_NESTEDHVM_H */
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel