[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/18] INSTALL: Mention kconfig
>>> On 08.10.18 at 16:08, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [PATCH 10/18] INSTALL: Mention kconfig"): >> On 05.10.18 at 19:29, <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > +silently overriden. The only way to find which configuration options >> >> Isn't it "overridden", or are both spellings okay? > > It is; I was wrong. > >> > +this varible there is nothing stopping you setting dangerously >> >> variable > > Fixed. > >> Beyond these nits I'm okay with the text now, accepting the anomaly >> pointed out by Doug. > > Thanks, I'll take that as an ack. (Assuming you did indeed mean > `accepting' rather than `excepting'.) Well, no, it was not meant as an ack, merely as the absence of further objections. (And yes, I did mean "accepting".) Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |