[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] iommu: setup inclusive mappings before enabling iommu
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 06:49:24AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 14.09.18 at 15:58, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Or else it can lead to freezes when enabling the iommu on certain > > Intel hardware: > > > > [...] > > (XEN) ELF: addresses: > > (XEN) virt_base = 0xffffffff80000000 > > (XEN) elf_paddr_offset = 0x0 > > (XEN) virt_offset = 0xffffffff80000000 > > (XEN) virt_kstart = 0xffffffff81000000 > > (XEN) virt_kend = 0xffffffff82953000 > > (XEN) virt_entry = 0xffffffff8274e180 > > (XEN) p2m_base = 0x8000000000 > > (XEN) Xen kernel: 64-bit, lsb, compat32 > > (XEN) Dom0 kernel: 64-bit, PAE, lsb, paddr 0x1000000 -> 0x295300 > > <freeze> > > > > This restores the behavior before commit 66a9274cc3435 that changed > > the order and enabled the iommu without having the inclusive mappings > > setup. > > > > Note that on AMD hardware the order is also changed to add inclusive > > mappings before adding any devices. > > > > Reported-by: Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@xxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > With the exception of the ARM aspect (because it's not > clear to me why the code removed from iommu_hwdom_init() > doesn't need to re-appear in ARM-specific code as well) > Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> I guess you mean the following chunk: - if ( iommu_hwdom_inclusive && !is_pv_domain(d) ) - { - printk(XENLOG_WARNING - "IOMMU inclusive mappings are only supported on PV Dom0\n"); - iommu_hwdom_inclusive = 0; - } I haven't added it for ARM because iommu_hwdom_inclusive is always set to 0 in the ARM case, so the condition would never match. Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |