[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86/HVM: correct hvmemul_map_linear_addr() for multi-page case
>>> On 13.09.18 at 13:06, <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 13 September 2018 11:13 >> >> @@ -544,7 +574,7 @@ static void *hvmemul_map_linear_addr( >> struct hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt) >> { >> struct vcpu *curr = current; >> - void *err, *mapping; >> + void *err = ZERO_BLOCK_PTR, *mapping; > > Given the revised logic, can't you just start *err with the value > ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_OKAY) now? You can then lose the extra test in the first if > of update_map_err(). No, I don't think I can, because of ... >> unsigned int nr_frames = ((linear + bytes - !!bytes) >> PAGE_SHIFT) - >> (linear >> PAGE_SHIFT) + 1; >> unsigned int i; >> @@ -600,27 +630,28 @@ static void *hvmemul_map_linear_addr( >> goto out; >> >> case HVMTRANS_bad_gfn_to_mfn: >> - err = NULL; >> - goto out; >> + err = update_map_err(err, NULL); >> + continue; >> >> case HVMTRANS_gfn_paged_out: >> case HVMTRANS_gfn_shared: >> - err = ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_RETRY); >> - goto out; >> + err = update_map_err(err, ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_RETRY)); >> + continue; >> >> default: >> - goto unhandleable; >> + err = update_map_err(err, ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE)); >> + continue; >> } >> >> *mfn++ = page_to_mfn(page); >> >> if ( p2m_is_discard_write(p2mt) ) >> - { >> - err = ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_OKAY); >> - goto out; >> - } >> + err = update_map_err(err, ERR_PTR(~X86EMUL_OKAY)); ... this and ... >> } >> >> + if ( err != ZERO_BLOCK_PTR ) >> + goto out; ... this. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |