|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/mm: Drop {HAP,SHADOW}_ERROR() wrappers
>>> On 30.08.18 at 17:20, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 30/08/18 16:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 28.08.18 at 20:11, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> @@ -2478,9 +2478,7 @@ sh_map_and_validate_gl4e(struct vcpu *v, mfn_t gl4mfn,
>>> shadow_l4_index,
>>> validate_gl4e);
>>> #else // ! GUEST_PAGING_LEVELS >= 4
>>> - SHADOW_ERROR("called in wrong paging mode!\n");
>>> - BUG();
>>> - return 0;
>>> + BUG(); /* Called in wrong paging mode! */
>>> #endif
>>> }
>> Isn't this going to break the build for certain older gcc versions?
>> ISTR some similar problems in the past.
>
> Perhaps, but since this code was written, BUG() has gained an
> unreachable() hint. As other examples of this code like this compile, I
> don't think this is going to be a problem.
The problem(s) I think I recall certainly post-date the introduction of
unreachable(). Perhaps whether a compiler would produce a
diagnostic depends on other factors as well. I'm not objecting to this
going in unchanged; in the worst case we'll have to re-introduce the
"return" later on.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |